Using conservation of energy with pendulums

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the conservation of energy principle to predict the velocity of a pendulum bob at various heights and angles. Participants explore the implications of potential and kinetic energy in the context of pendulum motion, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how conservation of energy applies to pendulums, particularly regarding the velocity of the bob at a specific angle and height, questioning the role of tension in the wire.
  • Another participant clarifies that kinetic energy is a scalar quantity and does not have direction, emphasizing that the direction of motion must be determined by the properties of the pendulum.
  • A third participant notes the importance of choosing a reference level for potential energy and states that the tension in the rope does no work, allowing for the use of conservation of total energy.
  • Further discussion arises about the comparison between the velocity of a free-falling object and that of a pendulum bob, with questions about how the direction of the velocity vectors affects their magnitudes.
  • One participant confirms that the magnitudes of the velocities can be equal, despite the different directions, explaining that tension changes the direction of the velocity without affecting its magnitude.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of conservation of energy to pendulum motion, but there are ongoing questions and clarifications regarding the implications of tension and the relationship between the velocities of the pendulum and a free-falling object. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of fully clarifying these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of reference levels for potential energy and the role of tension in the pendulum's motion, indicating potential limitations in understanding how these factors interact with energy conservation.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I am confused about how the principle of conservation of energy can be used to predict the velocity of a pendulums for any given height and angle. For example, say I use the equation U = -K (potential is equal to kinetic) to solve for the velocity at 15 degrees of a pendulum bob whose wire length is 1.2 m. The answer turns out to be 1.5 m/s. But this confuses me. The bob is not in free fall because there is the tension of the wire pulling on the pendulum bob. So what does this 1.5 m/s refer to? How does the equation "know" that the bob is swinging in an arc and not vertically falling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation doesn't "know" and doesn't care! The kinetic energy is a scalar and has no direction. YOU have to use the properties of the pendulum to determine the direction of motion. IF the pendulum is "rigid", so has a constant length, then pendulum bob must move along a circle with radius equal to the constant length of the pendulum so the velocity vector must be tangent to that circle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97
Be careful with the "reference level for potential energy". It is better to say U+K=constant, which could be zero, if the reference level is chosen correctly.

The tension in the rope does zero work (because the that force is always perpendicular to the displacement)... that's why you can use conservation of total energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97
HallsofIvy said:
The equation doesn't "know" and doesn't care! The kinetic energy is a scalar and has no direction. YOU have to use the properties of the pendulum to determine the direction of motion. IF the pendulum is "rigid", so has a constant length, then pendulum bob must move along a circle with radius equal to the constant length of the pendulum so the velocity vector must be tangent to that circle.

So if I had a free falling object, would the velocity gained in the distance "fallen," .12 meters , be the same as the velocity of the pendulum, given that for the free falling object the velocity vector is pointed downwards while for the pendulum it is tangent to the arc? If the vectors are in completely different directions, how are the magnitudes of the velocity equal?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
So if I had a free falling object, would the velocity gained in the distance "fallen," .12 meters , be the same as the velocity of the pendulum, given that for the free falling object the velocity vector is pointed downwards while for the pendulum it is tangent to the arc?
Yes. (At least for a simple pendulum.)

Mr Davis 97 said:
If the vectors are in completely different directions, how are the magnitudes of the velocity equal?
The wire changes the direction of the velocity. Since the tension is perpendicular to the velocity, it changes the direction but not the magnitude. (The tension force does no work on the pendulum bob, as robphy noted.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K