Using derivative with apparent increasing values

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if the derivative of a function, f'(x_0), is greater than zero at a point x_0, then there exists a delta (δ) such that f(x) is less than f(x_0) and f(y) is greater than f(x_0) for all x and y within the interval (x_0 - δ, x_0 + δ). The participants emphasize the necessity of using the epsilon-delta definition of limits to establish this conclusion rigorously. They suggest defining a new function g(x) to facilitate the proof, ultimately demonstrating that the function is indeed increasing in the specified interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of derivatives and their implications, specifically f'(x) and its relationship to function behavior.
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-delta definition of limits in calculus.
  • Ability to construct and analyze functions and their properties, particularly in the context of increasing functions.
  • Knowledge of basic algebraic manipulation and inequalities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail to strengthen understanding of continuity and differentiability.
  • Explore the Mean Value Theorem and its applications in proving function behavior based on derivatives.
  • Investigate the implications of higher-order derivatives on the concavity and behavior of functions.
  • Practice constructing proofs involving derivatives and function behavior to enhance problem-solving skills in calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on derivatives and their implications, as well as educators seeking to clarify the relationship between derivatives and function behavior in their teaching materials.

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


"If [itex]f'(x_0)>0[/itex] for some point [itex]x_0[/itex] in the interior of the domain of [itex]f[/itex] show that there is a [itex]\delta>0[/itex] so that

[tex]f(x)<f(x_0)<f(y)[/tex]

whenever [itex]x_0-\delta<x<x_0<y<x_0+\delta[/itex]. Does this assert that [itex]f[/itex] is increasing in the interval [itex](x_0-\delta,x_0+\delta)[/itex]?"

Homework Equations



[tex]f'(x_0)=\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


To be honest, the only way I could get this to work is by assuming the function is increasing given that the derivative is greater than zero, but it appears that is something I am suppose to show in the first place. The direction I want to take in my mind is that I can make two chords on the function, one from [itex]f(x)[/itex] to [itex]f(x_0)[/itex] and the other from [itex]f(x_0)[/itex] to [itex]f(y)[/itex] using the given data that the derivative is greater than zero. But I'm not sure how to lump in the epsilon-delta stuff.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jfy4 said:

Homework Statement


"If [itex]f'(x_0)>0[/itex] for some point [itex]x_0[/itex] in the interior of the domain of [itex]f[/itex] show that there is a [itex]\delta>0[/itex] so that

[tex]f(x)<f(x_0)<f(y)[/tex]

whenever [itex]x_0-\delta<x<x_0<y<x_0+\delta[/itex]. Does this assert that [itex]f[/itex] is increasing in the interval [itex](x_0-\delta,x_0+\delta)[/itex]?"


Homework Equations



[tex]f'(x_0)=\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


To be honest, the only way I could get this to work is by assuming the function is increasing given that the derivative is greater than zero, but it appears that is something I am suppose to show in the first place.
Right, you need to show this, so you can't just assume it.
jfy4 said:
The direction I want to take in my mind is that I can make two chords on the function, one from [itex]f(x)[/itex] to [itex]f(x_0)[/itex] and the other from [itex]f(x_0)[/itex] to [itex]f(y)[/itex] using the given data that the derivative is greater than zero. But I'm not sure how to lump in the epsilon-delta stuff.

Start with this,
[tex]f'(x_0)=\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}[/tex]

but write it in terms of the epsilon-delta definition of a limit.
 
Here is my attempt at the solution after some more time... :

First let

[tex]g(x)=\frac{f(x)-f(x_0)}{x-x_0}[/tex]

then we know that

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0}g(x)>0.[/tex]

Then pick an [itex]\epsilon=g(x_0)/2>0[/itex], then there exists a [itex]\delta>0[/itex] such that for all [itex]x\in(x_0-\delta,x_0+\delta)[/itex], [itex]g(x)\in(g(x_0)-\epsilon,g(x_0)+\epsilon)[/itex]. Then pick an arbitrary element in the interval and note that if [itex]x<x_0[/itex], then [itex]f(x)<f(x_0)[/itex], and if [itex]y>x_0[/itex], then [itex]f(y)>f(x_0)[/itex], as demanded by the strict positive inequality. Then there exists a [itex]\delta[/itex] such that if [itex]x_0-\delta<x<x_0<y<x_0+\delta[/itex], then [itex]f(x)<f(x_0)<f(y)[/itex]. [itex]\blacksquare[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K