Using Faraday's laws to find the induced EMF

Click For Summary
Induced EMF can occur even when the magnetic field, area, or angle remain constant, particularly when considering spatially separated points like the rim and center of a rotating disc. The discussion clarifies that Faraday's law applies to the EMF around a closed loop, which is not present when examining the rim and center directly. However, by conceptualizing a rotating radius as a closed loop, one can calculate the induced EMF by considering the change in area as the radius moves. This approach requires an imaginative interpretation of the closed loop during rotation. Ultimately, understanding the dynamics of the rotating disc allows for the application of Faraday's law in this scenario.
L_ucifer
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A circular disk of radius a is rotating at a constant angular speed w in a uniform magnetic field, B, which is directed out of the plane of the page.
Relevant Equations
\epsilon = \frac{d\Phi } {dt} = BAcos(\theta )
Here is the question:
Screenshot 2022-05-09 at 4.19.55 PM.png

We know the equation \epsilon = \frac{d\phi }{dt} = BAcos(\theta ). This means that the only way we can create an induced voltage is if we change the magnetic field, change the area of the loop in the magnetic field, or change the angle between the normal vector to the surface of the loop and the magnetic field. In this question, neither of those things are changing. Why would there still be induced emf?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L_ucifer said:
\epsilon = \frac{d\Phi } {dt} = BAcos(\theta )
This is true for the EMF around a closed loop. You are being asked for the EMF between the rim and the center of the disc. Since these are spatially separated, there is no closed loop here.

Edit: A lot of the answers can also be discarded solely based on dimensional analysis.
 
Orodruin said:
This is true for the EMF around a closed loop. You are being asked for the EMF between the rim and the center of the disc. Since these are spatially separated, there is no closed loop here.

Edit: A lot of the answers can also be discarded solely based on dimensional analysis.
That makes sense, thanks.
 
Still Faraday's law can be used to calculate the EMF here but we got to have a little imagination on what exactly is the closed loop: Consider a radius of the disk. Then as the disk rotates, imagine that this radius rotate too and the closed loop is the cyclic sector that has the initial position of the radius, the final position of the radius and the in between part of the circumference of disk. Calculate the rate of change of the area of this closed loop as the radius rotate and multiply it by B the intensity of magnetic field..
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...