Using Gauss' law to find the induced surface charge density ##\sigma##

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on using Gauss' law to determine the induced surface charge density, denoted as ##\sigma##, for a cylindrical conductor. The user initially calculated ##\sigma = -2.6 \times 10^{-7} \, C/m^2## but later realized the correct value is ##\sigma = +26 \, nC/m^2## after identifying a calculation error. The Gaussian surface chosen was a thin cylindrical shell with a radius of ##3 \, cm##. The relationship derived was ##\sigma = -\frac{\lambda}{2\pi R}##, which is critical for understanding induced charge density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts in conductors
  • Basic knowledge of cylindrical coordinates
  • Ability to perform calculations involving charge density and electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss' law in electrostatics
  • Learn about the properties of electric fields in conductors
  • Explore cylindrical coordinate systems in electromagnetism
  • Practice problems involving induced charge densities and electric fields
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone studying electrostatics, particularly those focusing on charge distribution and electric fields in conductors.

Meow12
Messages
46
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
A thin insulating rod with charge density ##\lambda=\rm+5\ nC/m## is arranged inside a thin conducting cylindrical shell of radius ##R=\rm 3\ cm##. The rod and shell are on the same axis, and you can assume they are both infinite in length. What is the SURFACE charge density ##\sigma## induced on the OUTSIDE of the conducting shell in ##\rm C/m^2##?
Relevant Equations
Statement of Gauss's Law: ##\displaystyle\oint\limits\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}##
physics.png
My attempt:


The electric field in the interior of a conductor is ##0##.

By symmetry, the electric field is directed radially outward.

Take the Gaussian surface as the thin cylindrical shell of radius ##\rm 3\ cm## and length ##L##.

##\displaystyle\oint\limits\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}##

Since ##E=0## everywhere, ##Q=0##

##\lambda L+\sigma\cdot 2\pi R L=0##

##\lambda+2\pi R\sigma=0##

##\displaystyle\sigma=\rm-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi R}##

Upon substituting the values, we get ##\rm\sigma=-2.6\times 10^{-7}\ C/m^2##

##\sigma_{outside}=\rm+2.6\times 10^{-7}\ C/m^2=\rm +260\ nC/m^2##

But the correct answer is ##\rm +26\ nC/m^2##. I'm off by a factor of ##10##; where have I gone wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Meow12 said:
##\displaystyle\sigma=\rm-\frac{\lambda}{2\pi R}##

Upon substituting the values, we get ##\rm\sigma=-2.6\times 10^{-7}\ C/m^2##
Your formula is correct. When I substitute the values, I get a result that is about 1/10 of your value. Check your work. If you still aren't getting the correct value, show the numerical values that you used in the formula.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Meow12 and berkeman
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!Your formula is correct. When I substitute the values, I get a result that is about 1/10 of your value. Check your work. If you still aren't getting the correct value, show the numerical values that you used in the formula.
Yeah, I had made a silly calculation mistake. Thanks for your post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and TSny

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K