Using Rspec to Interpret Stellar Spectra

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raxas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra Stellar
Click For Summary
A high school student is attempting to analyze stellar spectra using Rspec but is struggling with the process despite having the necessary equipment. They have calibrated their images but are unsure of the next steps and seek guidance on improving their results. Suggestions include using longer exposure times, adjusting the input data for better signal-to-noise ratios, and familiarizing themselves with Rspec by starting with simpler targets. It is also recommended to modify the setup by adjusting the distance between the grating and the CCD chip to enhance the spectrum's clarity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper calibration and technique in spectral analysis.
Raxas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, PF.
I'm a simple high school student who likes a challenge, and as such, I decided to put together a research project involving reading spectral lines from photographs I took. I got the lens, I got the camera, I got pictures, and now I'm stumped. Reading up on Rpsec, a lot of it's users heralded it as "one of the easiest programs to use" for this kind of stuff. Much to my disappointment, it appears the people who said that probably had a more extensive knowledge of the subject than I did when they used it.
http://filesmelt.com/dl/calibratedimage.png
I've calibrated the image (at least I think I did, if I did something wrong, for the love of all that is good tell me), and I don't know where to go from here.

If I'm too far over my head and this is a dead end, just tell me and spare the sympathy, I'd rather not waste time with a dead-end project. If it can be done, I implore you to reveal the secret.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What are you taking pictures of?
 
try using longer exposures if you can. Is your scope on a tracking mount? You appear to have all that Rspec can give you but the noise is on the same scale as the absorptions you intend to see. You might also try to modify your input data by "stretching" in a program like Photoshop. Play with the contrast, saturation and brightness controls to get as much signal/noise as you can.
 
Drakkith said:
What are you taking pictures of?

Yes, what star are you looking at? You might start by taking a pic of the blue sky through a pinhole or slit and work that up to familarize yourself with Rspec as well.

edit. based on the filename of HD11506 I'm guessing that he is trying to duplicate the spectral identification of HD11506b by doppler spectrometry.
 
You might try to mount your grating a little farther from the CCD chip. Mounting it farther away spreads out the spectrum and dims the image a bit. If you do that, you will need to increase your integration time (or decrease your frames/sec if you are using a webcam). Don't forget to use an IR filter for your camera along with your grating (grism?) if the grating itself isn't a good enough IR filter.
 
UC Berkely, December 16, 2025 https://news.berkeley.edu/2025/12/16/whats-powering-these-mysterious-bright-blue-cosmic-flashes-astronomers-find-a-clue/ AT 2024wpp, a luminous fast blue optical transient, or LFBOT, is the bright blue spot at the upper right edge of its host galaxy, which is 1.1 billion light-years from Earth in (or near) a galaxy far, far away. Such objects are very bright (obiously) and very energetic. The article indicates that AT 2024wpp had a peak luminosity of 2-4 x...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K