Using Separation of Variables to find potential inside of a sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the electric potential inside a cubical box with specific boundary conditions, where five metal plates are grounded and one insulated plate is held at a constant potential. The subject area pertains to solving a three-dimensional partial differential equation using separation of variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriateness of using trigonometric versus exponential solutions based on boundary conditions. There is exploration of the implications of using hyperbolic functions (cosh and sinh) for the Z direction. Questions arise regarding the relationships between coefficients and how to apply the boundary conditions effectively.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using hyperbolic functions to simplify the problem, while others express uncertainty about the relationships between coefficients and the application of boundary conditions. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific boundary conditions that must be satisfied and question the implications of these conditions on the potential function. There is mention of constraints related to the coefficients and their relationships, as well as the challenge of applying the last boundary condition effectively.

mdwerner
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cubical box (sides of length a) consists of five metal plates, which are welded together and grounded (Fig 3.23). The top is made of a separate sheet of metal, insulated from the others, and held at a constant potential V0. Find the potential inside the box.


Homework Equations



If [tex]\frac{1}{X}[/tex] [tex]\frac{ d^{2} X}{dx^{2}}[/tex] = Cx , then the solution is in an exponential form, otherwise is is in the trigonometric form.


The Attempt at a Solution



Because in the X and Y directions the potential function must be zero twice, I decided that they must be of the trigonometric solution form. In the Z direction I chose it to have an exponential solution.
I decided that the boundary conditions were the following :
V(x,0,z) = 0
V(0,y,z) = 0
V(x,y,0) = 0
V(x,a,z) = 0
V(a,y,z) = 0
V(x,y,a) = V0

Applying these I decided that
X(x) = A sin [(n * π / a) x]
Y(y) = C sin [(m * π / a) y]
and
Z(z) = E [tex]e^{\sqrt{k^{2} + l^{2}} z}[/tex] - E [tex]e^{-\sqrt{k^{2} + l^{2}} z}[/tex]

However, I do not know where to go from here. I have not applied the last boundary condition that I listed, but I do not see how it would simplify the expression...are my boundary conditions correct? I don't see how I can solve any farther to find the coefficients A,C, and E.
Any advice on how to solve this things or criticism of my work will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have a 3D PDE that is not too different from the 2D. You tell me, what are the boundary conditions?
 
Ah, okay, I see your edit now. The boundary conditions are fine. Try using cosh and sinh as the solution to Z(z). Exponentials are really only good if you are dealing with a boundary condition of infinity. Also, remember how the coefficients all relate to each other. :)
 
What do you mean "remember how all the coefficents relate to each other..." ? I am unaware of any relationship between the coefficients.

Also, I don't see how using the cosh helps -

My problem is that I don't understand how the last boundary condition that I listed can be applied. I already have expressions for the variables k and l (From the equations X and Y), so the only variable left when applying V(x,y,a) = V0 is the coefficient E. Is this correct? I have been reading other similar problems like this and I do not see any which solve to get EXACT values for the coefficients...EDIT : Actually, nevermind - the cosh does help, as it allows boundary condition 3 to cancel out the cosh term, leaving only the sinh term. Thanks for that bit of advice :)
 
Yeah, using cosh and sinh will let you get rid of the cosh from V(z=0)=0.

So back in the very beginning of the problem you would have had something that looked like this

[tex]\frac{1}{X}\frac{\partial^2 X}{\partial x^2} + \frac{1}{Y}\frac{\partial^2 Y}{\partial y^2} + \frac{1}{Z}\frac{\partial^2 Z}{\partial z^2}=0[/tex]

and the only way for that equation to work out is if each individual piece is a constant. So you made

[tex]\frac{1}{X}\frac{\partial^2 X}{\partial x^2}=k_x^2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{Y}\frac{\partial^2 Y}{\partial y^2}=k_y^2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{Z}\frac{\partial^2 Z}{\partial z^2}=-k_z^2[/tex]

Which gives the constraint that

[tex]k_x^2+k_y^2-k_z^2=0[/tex]

So for your Z equation I imagine you are stuck here

[tex]Z(z)=A sinh(k_z z)[/tex]

You know k_z in terms of the other constants k_x and k_y. You can get A from the boundary conditions.

Putting all that together you just use orthogonality in the end to determine the coefficients of n and m (griffiths calls them c_n and c_m respectively).
 
Hey how do we know which constant is neg or positive , where u have k2 does it matter ?
thxs
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K