Using Spivak's Calculus to prep for honors Real Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To prepare for honors Real Analysis based on Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis," students should focus on Spivak's "Calculus," specifically the first 20 chapters. While some recommend completing all problems, a more effective strategy is to solve approximately 10 questions per section to build proof skills. Understanding mathematical proofs is crucial for success in Rudin's course, as many students struggle not due to a lack of background knowledge but because of inadequate proof techniques. A supplementary resource is a course at UT that utilizes Spivak, which can be followed for additional guidance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs
  • Basic understanding of calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis"
  • Access to Spivak's "Calculus"
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the first 20 chapters of Spivak's "Calculus"
  • Practice solving 10 problems per section in Spivak
  • Study proof techniques and strategies for mathematical reasoning
  • Follow the UT course linked in the discussion for structured learning
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for honors Real Analysis, particularly those transitioning from calculus to advanced mathematical proofs, and anyone seeking to enhance their understanding of mathematical analysis through Spivak's approach.

torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Hi, my university is offering a honors version of real analysis based off of Rudin's principals of mathematical analysis. I've heard that Spivak is good preparation so I bought it. It has 30 something chapters so I don't know if I can go through it all. Generally, for anybody who knows, how much of the book should I go through if I want to be prepared to tackle the likes of Rudin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best way to prepare for a class using Rudin is to read Rudin! Then when you get stuck, look up the corresponding topic in Spivak, where it should be covered in more depth.
 
People get killed in Rudin not because they don't have the necessary background, but because they are not good at proofs. So learning to do math proofs would serve you better than any intro analysis text.

Having said that, if you are using Spivak you would need to do the first 20 chapters or so. Many will say do all his problems, I think that's too extreme - and time consuming. A good effort on 10 questions per section will do you more good than spending 10 minutes on each one and looking up the answer. Here is a link to a course at UT that uses Spivak first year, follow it along http://www.math.toronto.edu/~drorbn/classes/0405/157AnalysisI/index.html
 
TL;DR: How can I begin to gain an understanding of astronomy? Hello there, and thank you in advance to anyone that might answer this. I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to post a question like this, as I am new to this website and also very nervous about making a post that others might see/reply to. I am a freshman in high school and I am interested in astronomy. I want to learn about space, but I am not quite sure where to begin. Is there anything that I can do to seriously expand my...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K