Using the condition of vector equilibrium

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the summation of cosines, specifically \(\sum^{2n-1}_{k=0} \cos \left(\frac{k \pi}{n}\right)\), equals zero using the condition of vector equilibrium. Participants clarify the meaning of the sigma notation, emphasizing that it represents the sum of terms from a specified range. They suggest visualizing n equal vectors positioned at angles of \(\frac{2\pi}{n}\) to understand their components and resultant. The consensus is that the sum of the components of these vectors should equal zero, reinforcing the proof's objective. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the mathematical notation and the relationship between vector components and their resultant.
ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using the condition of vector equilibrium, prove that
\sum^{2n-1}_{k=0} cos ((k*pi)/n)

Where n is an integer.

Homework Equations



I know that if n equal vectors are at an angle (2*pi)/n
Their resultant is zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



Please first explain to me what does this sigma signify and what is meant by its subscript and superscript. Then please give me an idea of what to do with this problem. Thanks.

Ritwik
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sigma is a symbol for summation. For example

\sum_{i = 1}^{i = 5} f(i)

just means f(1) + f(2) + f(3) + f(4) + f(5). The subscript is the value at which i begins, and the superscript is the value at which i ends.
 
ritwik06 said:
I know that if n equal vectors are at an angle (2*pi)/n
Their resultant is zero.

HI ritwik06! :smile:

Hint: Draw those n equal vectors.

What are the coordinates of their endpoints? :smile:
 
Using the condition of vector equilibrium, prove that:

\sum_{k = 0}^{2n-1} cos \frac{k*pi}{n}=0
where n is an integer

Hey, help me please. Please tell me what do I have to prove.
Hey dx. I agree with your format but i don't think it is applicable with my form of question. Please help!
 
Last edited:
Think about the components of the vectors you mentioned in your first post. What are the components, and what should their sum be?

ritwik06 said:
Hey dx. I agree with your format but i don't think it is applicable with my form of question. Please help!

What do you mean its not applicable? All I did was show you what sigma meant, because you asked.
 
Precaution:
cos is upon the whole fraction {(k*pi)/n}
Please just let me know once what I need to prove. As u said dx that the superscript signifis the upperlimit of the variable. but in this case the limit itself is a variable. Please help
 
dx said:
Think about the components of the vectors you mentioned in your first post. What are the components, and what should their sum be?



What do you mean its not applicable? All I did was show you what sigma meant, because you asked.

Thir sum will be zero!

Oh, yes but please re chck the format of my question. Please!
 
No, its not. n is the number of vectors. Its not changing.
 
ritwik06 said:
Thir sum will be zero!

Ok, so write it out explicitly and see what its going to look like.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K