Using the Definition: Showing $u \in C^0 [0,1]$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating the embedding of the Sobolev space $W^{1,p}(0,1)$ into the space of continuous functions $C^0[0,1]$. The user aims to establish that if $u \in W^{1,p}(0,1)$, then $u$ is also in $C^0[0,1]$. Key points include the use of the integral representation $u(x+h) - u(x) = \int_{x}^{x+h} u'(t) dt$ and the application of the Sobolev embedding theorem to show that $u$ satisfies a Hölder continuity condition, which implies continuity. Challenges arise from the weak definition of the derivative $u'$ and the almost everywhere equivalence of functions in $W^{1,p}(0,1)$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Sobolev spaces, specifically $W^{1,p}(0,1)$
  • Understanding of continuous functions in the context of $C^0[0,1]$
  • Knowledge of integral calculus and properties of derivatives
  • Familiarity with the Sobolev embedding theorem and Hölder continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Sobolev embedding theorem in detail
  • Learn about Hölder continuity and its implications for function behavior
  • Investigate the concept of absolute continuity and its relationship to Sobolev spaces
  • Explore the weak derivative and distributional derivatives in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those focusing on functional analysis, Sobolev spaces, and the properties of continuous functions. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the relationships between different function spaces.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to show the embedding $W^{1,p}(0,1) \subset C^0 [0,1]$.

So we pick a $u \in W^{1,p}(0,1)$ and want to show that $u \in C^0 [0,1]$.

Let $x_n \to x$. We want to show that $u(x_n) \to u(x)$.

Since $u \in W^{1,p}(0,1)$ we have that $u \in L_p$ and $u' \in L_p$.

And you told me to use the fact that $u(x+h)-u(x)=\int_{x}^{x+h} u'(t) dt$.

We know that a function $f$ is continuous in $x_0$ if $\forall \epsilon>0 \exists \delta>0$ such that $\forall y \in [x,x+h]$ with $|y-x_0|< \delta$ it holds that $|f(y)-f(x_0)|< \epsilon$.

Can we use this definition for $f=u, x_0=x, y=x+h$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

I want to show the embedding $W^{1,p}(0,1) \subset C^0 [0,1]$.

So we pick a $u \in W^{1,p}(0,1)$ and want to show that $u \in C^0 [0,1]$.

Let $x_n \to x$. We want to show that $u(x_n) \to u(x)$.

Since $u \in W^{1,p}(0,1)$ we have that $u \in L_p$ and $u' \in L_p$.

And you told me to use the fact that $u(x+h)-u(x)=\int_{x}^{x+h} u'(t) dt$.

We know that a function $f$ is continuous in $x_0$ if $\forall \epsilon>0 \exists \delta>0$ such that $\forall y \in [x,x+h]$ with $|y-x_0|< \delta$ it holds that $|f(y)-f(x_0)|< \epsilon$.

Can we use this definition for $f=u, x_0=x, y=x+h$ ?
An internet search shows that this result is not easy. It seems to require an application of the Sobolev embedding theorem to show that the function $u$ satisfies a Hölder continuity condition. That in turn implies continuity in the usual sense.

Difficulties in dealing with this problem include the facts that (1) the derivative $u'$ is defined in a weak, distributional, sense (if $u$ was differentiable in the classical sense then it would certainly be continuous); and (2) functions in the space $W^{1,p}(0,1)$ are only defined up to almost everywhere equivalence, so you may have to adjust them on a null set in order to make them continuous.
 
Opalg said:
An internet search shows that this result is not easy. It seems to require an application of the Sobolev embedding theorem to show that the function $u$ satisfies a Hölder continuity condition. That in turn implies continuity in the usual sense.

Difficulties in dealing with this problem include the facts that (1) the derivative $u'$ is defined in a weak, distributional, sense (if $u$ was differentiable in the classical sense then it would certainly be continuous); and (2) functions in the space $W^{1,p}(0,1)$ are only defined up to almost everywhere equivalence, so you may have to adjust them on a null set in order to make them continuous.

Couldn't we just show that $u$ is absolutely continuous?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K