Using the FTC to take a derivative

  • Thread starter Thread starter dumbQuestion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) to the derivative of a definite integral with bounds from x to x² for the function f(t) = t/ln(t). The user expresses confusion regarding the continuity of f(t) and whether it must be continuous on a closed interval to apply the FTC. It is clarified that as long as both x and x² are positive, the conditions for the FTC are satisfied on the closed interval between them, allowing for its application. The continuity of f(t) is acknowledged as being valid within the specified domain, thus not posing an issue for the problem at hand. The conclusion emphasizes that the FTC can be applied in this context despite the initial concerns about continuity.
dumbQuestion
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Simplify the following:

d/dx[∫(t/lnt)dt] where the integral is a definite integral with bounds from x to x2

Homework Equations



The Fundamental THeorem of calculus says:

Suppose f is continuous on [a,b]

Then ∫abf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a) where F is any antiderivative of f

The Attempt at a Solution



So this is how I thought to solve it. Let f(t)=t/lnt

First notice that f(t) continuous on (1,c] forall c in ℝ => f(t) integrable and there exists an antiderivative F(t) such that F'(t) = f(t)So let F(t) be such an antiderivative. ***By the fundamental theorem of calculus,

∫f(t)dt (where the integral bounds are from x to x2=F(x2)-F(x)

This means

d/dx[∫f(t)dt] (where the integral bounds are from x to x2=d/dx[F(x2)-F(x)] = d/dx[F(x2)] - d/dx(F(x)] = 2xF'(x2) - F'(x) [by the Chain Rule] = 2x(x2/ln(x2)) - x/lnx = 2x3/2lnx - x/lnx [by rules of logarithm] = (x3-x)/lnx (common denominator and added them together)So I get that as long as the bounds on the integral are from (0,c), the answer to
d/dx[∫(t/lnt)dt] where the integral is a definite integral with bounds from x to x2 = (x3-x)/lnxOK here is my problem, the book solves this almost exactly the same way, but they never make any mention of the bounds on the integral or continuity. I guess I am confused. Do I not need to think about where the function is continuous? It's just part of the FTC says "Suppose f is continuous on [a,b]" so it seems to me like I can only apply it when that part holds. Why don't you need to think of continuity in this case? There is no restriction in the problem statement about x. How do you solve this problem for any general x? Also the other problem, is the line where I put ***. I think I've done something wrong here because this function is only continuous on the open region (1,c] for all c, but the FTC requires f be continuous on a closed bounded region [a,b]. So do I just pick a number great than 1, say [1.1,c]? I mean what's the formal way to solve this with regards to the continuity aspect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem implicitly assumes ##t>0## hence ##x>0## and ##x^2>0## because ##t>0## is the domain of ##\ln(t)##. So there is no problem.
 
But doesn't f need to be continuous on a closed bounded interval [a,b]? ln(t) is only continuous on (0,c] for all c in R.Can you apply the FTC if f is only continuous on an interval (a,b]?
 
dumbQuestion said:
But doesn't f need to be continuous on a closed bounded interval [a,b]? ln(t) is only continuous on (0,c] for all c in R.


Can you apply the FTC if f is only continuous on an interval (a,b]?

Likely not; I'd have to check. But it doesn't matter for this question. If ##x## and ##x^2## are both positive, then all your conditions are true on the closed interval between them so you can use the FTC.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K