Using the Intermediate Value Theorem to Find Zeros in a Polynomial Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter ashleyrc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits Theorem
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the Intermediate Value Theorem to demonstrate that the polynomial function f(x) = x^3 + 3x - 2 has a zero within the interval [0, 1]. Participants are exploring the implications of the theorem in the context of polynomial functions and continuity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the values of the function at the endpoints of the interval, questioning how these relate to the existence of a zero. There is an exploration of the theorem's definition and its application to the problem. Some participants express confusion about the theorem's implications and seek clarification on its use.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the application of the theorem, with one clarifying the relationship between the function values at the endpoints and the existence of a zero. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, with some participants gaining a clearer understanding of the theorem's application.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and implications of the Intermediate Value Theorem, indicating a need for further clarification on continuity and the theorem's requirements. There is also mention of the challenge in interpreting the theorem's wording.

ashleyrc
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


use the intermediate theorem to show that the polynomial f(x) = x^3+3x-2 has a zero in the interval [0,1].


Homework Equations


?


The Attempt at a Solution


could someone explain to me where to start? when i graphed it, i saw that it intersects the x-axis at about .6, but i still don't know how to find the answer using the theorem. i couldn't find any decent explanations in my book or on the internet. please help me to understand this theorem!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are f(0) and f(1)? What does the intermediate value theorem say?
 
f(0) = -2
f(1) = 2
so the zero must be located somewhere between -2 and 2?
and since zero is located there, there is another value that can be used to pinpoint its location? at least that's how i comprehended the definition.
 
You are getting the intermediate value theorem wrong. It doesn't say that the x such that f(x)=0 is between -2 and 2. It says that it is between 0 and 1. You don't need to pinpoint its location. Reread the theorem.
 
that's the problem, i can't figure out what it is saying...
"if f(x) is a continuous function on [a,b] then for every D between f(a) and f(b), there exists a C between a and b so that f(C) = D"

i know that the function is continuous on [0,1], and for every value between f(0) and f(1), there is another value between 0 and 1 so that the function of the second value is equeal to the first value?

i really am having trouble understanding the entire concept of what the definition implies. how can i use the theorem to actually show that the zero lies in [0,1]? could you perhaps give me an example or something?
 
Ok, your example is the problem you've been given. You know it has a root near x=0.6, right? Take your statement of the intermediate value theorem and set a=0, b=1, f(a)=-2 and f(b)=2. I think that turns into "if f(x)=x^3+3x-2 is a continuous function on [0,1] then for every D between -2 and 2, there exists a C between 0 and 1 so that f(C) = D". Since 0 is between -2 and 2, there is a C so that f(C)=0. Do you see yet?
 
yeah, i think so... i was incorrect in using f(a) and a interchangably, as with f(b) and b.
it makes more sense the way you had it written. so my question is not actually asking me to find the exact coordinates where the zero is located, but rather to prove that the zero is located somewhere within the interval [0,1]. like you said, that can be proven because the theorem states that the zero is between -2 and 2 and thus there must be a point on the funtion that equeals 0 within the interval.
i think i finally understand it reasonably well, but my head really hurts now :)
 
S'ok. Give your head a rest. Forget the words. Take pencil and try to draw a continuous curve connecting (0,-2) with (1,2) without crossing the x-axis and x always increasing. Can't, right? That's all the theorem is saying.
 
thank's a lot! yeah, the words just made the math all the more confusing, but at least i get the concept now.
thanks for all of your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K