MHB Using Trigonometry for solving a Cubic equation

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

I need some help for this general cubic equation.

\[ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0\]. First divide the equation by a
\[x^3+b/ax^2+c/ax+d/a=0\]

Let x=y-b/(3a)
...

$$y^3+py+q=0$$
where $$p=c/a-(b/a)^2)/3;q=d/a-(b/a*c/a)/3+(b/a)^3/27$$
$$y=cos \theta$$
then i need to use the identity for $$cos(3\theta)= 4cos^3(\theta)-3cos(\theta) $$

and that is where need the help.
What to do next?

Thank you for your patiences
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I read that article already. I am still confuse with the substitution.
 
Cbarker1 said:
I read that article already. I am still confuse with the substitution.

Did you try the substitution $y=2\sqrt{-\frac p 3}\cos\theta$?
 
Why Do the substitution works?
 
Cbarker1 said:
Why Do the substitution works?

It is exactly the substitution the wiki article describes.
A great mathematician thought it up.
So yes, the substitution works.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top