Using Trigonometry to Solve for T₁ in a System of Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Trig
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations involving tension forces (T₁ and T₂) and angles (θ₁ and θ₂) in a physics context, specifically using trigonometric relationships. The original poster presents equations that relate these variables to a mass (mg) and seeks to isolate T₁.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the equations by isolating T₁ and using trigonometric identities. They express confusion over the division of equations leading to a reciprocal tangent and question the algebraic steps involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's attempts, providing feedback on calculations and clarifying the algebraic manipulations. Some participants suggest re-evaluating the calculations, while others explain the reasoning behind the transformations of the equations.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of flipping equations and the algebraic steps taken, with participants noting potential confusion regarding the treatment of terms and the separation of components in the equations.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



T₁cosθ₁+T₂cosθ₂=mg
T₁sinθ₁=T₂sinθ₂

Part A Isolating T₁ terms on one side,

T₁cosθ₁=mg‐T₂cosθ₂
T₁sinθ₁=T₂sinθ₂

Part B Dividing the two equations, using tanθ=sinθ/cosθ,

cosθ₁/sinθ₁=mg/(T₂sinθ₂)‐cosθ₂/sinθ₂

1/tanθ₁=mg/(T₂sinθ₂)‐1/tanθ₂

Homework Equations



SOH CAH TOA

The Attempt at a Solution



I copy and paste the problem from my textbook. I will show you my attempt at this problem.
My problem lies in Part B.

It says that I should use tanθ=sinθ/cosθ, but it flips the equation.

I want to set T₂ as 18.
I want to set mg as 22.
I want to set θ₂ as 64 degrees

Accordingly tanθ=sinθ/cosθ, would then be (18sinθ₂)/(mg-18cosθ₂) which would result = 1.1466.

(18sin64)/(22-18cos64)=

But if I plug the numbers that I set above, it would give me 1.402

mg/(T₂sinθ₂)‐cosθ₂/sinθ₂ = 22/(18sin64) - cos64/sin64 = 1.402
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi flyingpig,

I would try typing this into your calculator again. For your very last step, I get 0.872 instead of 1.402 which if you take 1/0.872, you get 1.1466 as above.

Hope this helps.
 
Coto said:
Hi flyingpig,

I would try typing this into your calculator again. For your very last step, I get 0.872 instead of 1.402 which if you take 1/0.872, you get 1.1466 as above.

Hope this helps.

I got it, but can you tell me why and how it is flipped?
 
In the first case, tanθ₁ = (T₂sinθ₂)/(mg-T₂cosθ₂). Plugging in your numbers yields 1.1466. That is:

\tan \theta _1 = 1.1466

In the second case (1/tanθ₁=mg/(T₂sinθ₂)‐1/tanθ₂), plugging in your numbers yields 0.872. That is:

\frac{1}{\tan \theta _1} = 0.872

So you can see that you've actually calculated 1/tan in the second case instead of tan like in the first case.
 
Coto said:
In the first case, tanθ₁ = (T₂sinθ₂)/(mg-T₂cosθ₂). Plugging in your numbers yields 1.1466. That is:

\tan \theta _1 = 1.1466

In the second case (1/tanθ₁=mg/(T₂sinθ₂)‐1/tanθ₂), plugging in your numbers yields 0.872. That is:

\frac{1}{\tan \theta _1} = 0.872

So you can see that you've actually calculated 1/tan in the second case instead of tan like in the first case.

Why do we even flip it?
 
Perhaps you're a bit confused with what you've done.

Starting from your original post. In part B you have written some equations down. Here you took equation 1 from part A and divided it by equation 2 from part A to get a 1/tan on one side and the rest on the other. This is what was done in part B. Now it would just be a matter of plugging in your numbers to get a solution.

However, in your "Attempt at the solution" section, for some reason, you re-did part B, but this time you divided equation 2 from Part A by equation 1 from Part A and hence you got a tan instead of a 1/tan, hence for the two solutions to compare you would have to do like I did in post #4.
 
Coto said:
Perhaps you're a bit confused with what you've done.

Starting from your original post. In part B you have written some equations down. Here you took equation 1 from part A and divided it by equation 2 from part A to get a 1/tan on one side and the rest on the other. This is what was done in part B. Now it would just be a matter of plugging in your numbers to get a solution.

However, in your "Attempt at the solution" section, for some reason, you re-did part B, but this time you divided equation 2 from Part A by equation 1 from Part A and hence you got a tan instead of a 1/tan, hence for the two solutions to compare you would have to do like I did in post #4.

cosθ₁/sinθ₁=mg/(T₂sinθ₂)‐cosθ₂/sinθ₂

mg/(T₂sinθ₂)‐cosθ₂/sinθ₂ <--- I want to focus on more on this part.

It is a problem from my textbook, I got confused by the bracket.

Originally the tan ratio is (T₂sinθ₂)/(mg - T₂cosθ₂), but when I flipped it, it should look like (mg - T₂cosθ₂)/(T₂sinθ₂).

(mg - T₂cosθ₂)/(T₂sinθ₂).
I know this is wrong, but how do I make the reciprocal of this and turn it into the verison my textbook had. Because I am really confused how my textbook separate the "cosθ₂/sinθ₂" from the (mg - T₂cosθ₂)/(T₂sinθ₂) equation. Also, if you can don't use the math operators like I have... that's probably where my question started. Thanks.
 
Okay, well it seems like you're stuck on just some basic algebra:

<br /> \tan \theta _1 = \frac{T_2 \sin \theta _2}{mg - T_2 \cos \theta _2}<br /> <br /> \implies \frac{1}{\tan \theta _1} = \frac{mg - T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2}<br />

Now for the part you seem to be stuck on:

<br /> \frac{mg - T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} <br /> = \frac{mg}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} - \frac{T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2}<br /> = \frac{mg}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} - \frac{1}{\tan \theta _2}<br />

Let me know if you have any questions, but beyond this we are getting into some really basic algebra.
 
Coto said:
Okay, well it seems like you're stuck on just some basic algebra:

<br /> \tan \theta _1 = \frac{T_2 \sin \theta _2}{mg - T_2 \cos \theta _2}<br /> <br /> \implies \frac{1}{\tan \theta _1} = \frac{mg - T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2}<br />

Now for the part you seem to be stuck on:

<br /> \frac{mg - T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} <br /> = \frac{mg}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} - \frac{T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2}<br /> = \frac{mg}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} - \frac{1}{\tan \theta _2}<br />

Let me know if you have any questions, but beyond this we are getting into some really basic algebra.

You've cleared up a lot! However...

<br /> \frac{mg - T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} <br /> = \frac{mg}{T_2 \sin \theta _2} - \frac{T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2}<br />

This is troubling me

<br /> \frac{T_2 \cos \theta _2}{T_2 \sin \theta _2}<br />

I am not saying you are incorrect, because I believe you are correct. But the textbook canceled out the T_2s

If they do they would it still make it equal? I am sorry for wasting your time on such a simple matter...I would've probably attracted more attention if I knew how to do nice operators.
 
  • #10
I neglected canceling out the T_2s just to show you the step where I split the fraction. You could have done the cancellation then too.

Notice in the last step, I make the cancellation, and the final answer is the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
23K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K