Using Waves to Find Depth of Well

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockerdude1210
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth Waves
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving sound waves and resonance in a well. The original poster describes using an audio oscillator to measure the depth of a well based on observed resonant frequencies. There is confusion regarding the appropriate formula for calculating the depth, specifically whether to use the equation for a tube open at both ends or one closed at one end.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply different formulas for resonant frequencies and questions the validity of their approach after receiving conflicting feedback from an online assignment platform.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of using different equations for closed and open tubes. Some guidance has been provided regarding the harmonic relationships in both scenarios, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an online assignment platform providing feedback on the correctness of the equations used, which may influence the understanding of the problem. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the assignment's accuracy and the implications of the equations involved.

rockerdude1210
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A student uses an audio oscillator of adjustable frequency to measure the depth of a dried up well. Two successive resonances are heard at 17.0Hz and 23.8Hz. The speed of sound in air is 343 m/s. How deep is the well?

Homework Equations



f=nv/4L

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I solved the problem and the answer was 25.22m. However, I got this answer by using the equation for a tube open at both ends. I was confused because I thought that the correct equation would have been the one for a tube open at one end and closed at the other. Can someone explain why f=nv/2L was used instead of f=nv/4L
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can and should use the closed ended pipe formula - did you try it?
Remember that n in the closed pipe formula, can only take odd-number values.
 
Yes, I tried it (f=nv/4L) with n equal to one and the online assignment page said that it was wrong and then when I used the open-open formula (f=nv/2L) with n equal to one, the website said that the answer was correct. I was assuming that it was an error with the answer, but I just wanted to make sure.
 
The assignment does not appear to be in error - you will get the same result using the correct equation provided you understand what you are doing.

For a closed tube resonator, if the first frequency is the nth harmonic, then the next freqeuncy will be the (n+2)th harmonic. The difference between them will be given by:
$$f_{n+2}-f_n = \frac{(n+2)v}{4L} - \frac{nv}{4L} = \frac{v}{2L}$$

But for an open open tube, the nth harmonic is followed by the (n+1)th harmonic - so the difference becomes:
$$f_{n+1}-f_n = \frac{(n+1)v}{2L}-\frac{nv}{2L} = \frac{v}{2L}$$
... exactly the same value.

The hint was trying to get you to realize that there was a shortcut.
 
Thank you!

I can't believe I missed that, it seems so simple now.
 
This is why it is important to understand the relations instead of just learning to use the equations.
In general, you should not follow a hint blindly - it should give you that "ah-ha!" moment at some stage.
If that does not happen, then go back to working without the hint.

I don't like to give out hints in my coursework because they can obscure important lessons.
i.e. Without the hint you'd probably have figured out that the question had set you up with two equations with two unknowns (n and L) then you solve by simultaneous equations to find L.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K