Jimmy Chung Messages 7 Reaction score 0 Thread starter Aug 22, 2013 #1 Is this proof of the chain rule valid ? Attachments Chain Rule.docx Chain Rule.docx 16.5 KB · Views: 296
Electric Red Messages 31 Reaction score 2 Aug 22, 2013 #2 How did you get this? Did you write this yourself?
Jimmy Chung Messages 7 Reaction score 0 Aug 22, 2013 #3 It's from a textbook...I just re-typed it into a word doc...
Jimmy Chung Messages 7 Reaction score 0 Aug 22, 2013 #4 Is it correct...I suspect there maybe some circular reasoning with the "error term" becoming 0 as h approaches 0.
Is it correct...I suspect there maybe some circular reasoning with the "error term" becoming 0 as h approaches 0.
Electric Red Messages 31 Reaction score 2 Aug 22, 2013 #5 It looks valid to me, but just tell us why you do not trust your book. At which part.
Jimmy Chung Messages 7 Reaction score 0 Aug 22, 2013 #6 Can you explain to be the part on the bottom when we set g2=g(x+h) but E(g2) turns into E(g(x)) not E(g(x+h)) ? If that's valid, why is the limit as h approaches 0 of E(g(x)) is 0 ?
Can you explain to be the part on the bottom when we set g2=g(x+h) but E(g2) turns into E(g(x)) not E(g(x+h)) ? If that's valid, why is the limit as h approaches 0 of E(g(x)) is 0 ?