Validity of Fourier Series Expansion for Non-Periodic Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of using Fourier series expansion for non-periodic functions, specifically in the context of the equation ∑^{∞}_{n=1} n An sin(πnx/L) = (λL/πc)σ(x-L/2) + A sin(πx/2). The key point established is that the right-hand side (RHS) can be treated as an odd function with a defined period of (-L, L) for the purpose of Fourier sine expansion. This approach allows for the determination of coefficients An by comparing them with the left-hand side (LHS), despite the RHS not being inherently periodic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series, particularly Fourier half-range sine expansion.
  • Familiarity with odd functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of periodicity and how it applies to function extension.
  • Basic calculus, specifically series and convergence concepts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier half-range sine expansions in detail.
  • Explore the concept of extending non-periodic functions to periodic ones.
  • Learn about the implications of odd and even functions in Fourier analysis.
  • Investigate practical applications of Fourier series in solving differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on Fourier analysis, signal processing, and applied mathematics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of function periodicity and Fourier series applications.

sandylam966
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given ∑^{∞}_{n=1} n An sin(\frac{n\pi x}{L}) = \frac{λL}{\pi c} σ(x-\frac{L}{2}) + A sin(\frac{\pi x}{2}), where L, λ, c, σ and A are known constants, find An.


Homework Equations



Fourier half-range sine expansion.

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand I should expand the RHS as an odd function with period (-L, L) and then compare the coefficients with the LHS, and I do get to correct result. However I didn't understand why I could do so. I mean, originally RHS is NOT a periodic function, that it certainly does not equal the 'constructed' Fourier sine expansion. So how could the coefficients equal since it's actually a different function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you know you get the "correct result"? Do you mean you get the result given in your text?

If so then the given answer is NOT for the given function but for a function defined to be \frac{\lambda L}{\pi c}\sigma(x-\frac{L}{2})+ A sin(\frac{\pi x}{2}) on (-L, L) and continued "by periodicity" to the rest of the real numbers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K