Valley Degeneracy of Semiconductor Band Systems

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Quasi Particle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degeneracy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of valley degeneracy in semiconductor band systems, particularly focusing on the conduction band and its relationship to the band gap type (direct vs. indirect). Participants explore the implications of valley degeneracy in different semiconductor materials and the conditions under which it occurs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants introduce the concept of valley degeneracy, suggesting it relates to the presence of multiple equivalent energy minima in the conduction band, particularly when the wave vector is not at the center of the Brillouin zone.
  • Others argue that the conduction band can exhibit different valley degeneracies depending on the semiconductor material, with silicon having six valleys due to its crystal structure, while gallium arsenide (GaAs) does not exhibit valley degeneracy.
  • There is a suggestion that the type of band gap (direct or indirect) influences the presence of valley degeneracy, with indirect band gaps allowing for multiple valleys in k-space.
  • One participant notes that the width of the band gap may affect whether a semiconductor is considered "degenerate," raising questions about the definitions used in this context.
  • Discussion includes the role of spin degeneracy, particularly in relation to the valence band and the effects of spin-orbit coupling, which can alter the degeneracy of states.
  • Participants clarify the differences in symmetry properties between silicon and GaAs, noting how these differences impact the degeneracy of their conduction bands.
  • One participant acknowledges confusion between the degeneracies of the conduction and valence bands, indicating a need for further clarification on these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the relationship between band gap type and valley degeneracy, with no consensus reached on the implications of these relationships. Some agree on the definitions of degeneracy while others challenge or refine these ideas, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the topic, noting that definitions and assumptions about degeneracy may vary based on the context of the discussion, particularly regarding thermal energy and statistical treatment of electrons in semiconductors.

Quasi Particle
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hiya,

trying to learn something about the band system of semiconductors, I found that the conduction band is degenerated at the minimum by valley degeneracy.

Do you know where this comes from? In how far is it dependent of the form of the band gap (i.e. direct, indirect)?

I would be very glad for any explanations or references!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The conduction band is doubly degenerate because there are 2 electrons. Never heard of valley degeneracy before.
 
If the minimum of the conduction band has a wave vector that is not at the center of the Brillouin zone (at Gamma, k=0), there will be several valleys of minimal energy in different but equivalent k-directions.

Maybe this is called valley degeneracy.
 
just consider the case of bulk onductor like Si. The valley minima along delta direction which in the momentum space is denoted by the direction vector [0,0,1] [0,1,0] etc. There are six such possible direction, resulting in a valley degeneracy of six.
 
Hm, I was thinking too one-dimensionally. Cheers.

But wait. Why are there only different valleys (or directions) if the band gap is indirect?
There is no valley degeneracy in GaAs, and it has the same crystal structure as Si except that it has a basis of two different atoms and Si a basis of two equal atoms.
There seems to be a dependency from the width of the band gap. If it is much greater than the thermal energy, the semiconductor is called "not degenerated". I don't see how that fits in.

@ Dr. Transport: Do you mean spin degeneracy? I think that occurs at the valence band (?)
 
Quasi Particle said:
Hm, I was thinking too one-dimensionally. Cheers.
But wait. Why are there only different valleys (or directions) if the band gap is indirect?
There is no valley degeneracy in GaAs, and it has the same crystal structure as Si except that it has a basis of two different atoms and Si a basis of two equal atoms.
There seems to be a dependency from the width of the band gap. If it is much greater than the thermal energy, the semiconductor is called "not degenerated". I don't see how that fits in.
@ Dr. Transport: Do you mean spin degeneracy? I think that occurs at the valence band (?)

There are only degeneracy for indirect semicon because the conduction valley minima can be allowed to have minima in k-space which are symmetrically the same. Direct bandgap means the minima is at [0,0,0] and there is no other accompanied valley minima.

Except for the case of valence band where it is triply degenrate due to symmetry. But when one consider spin orbit coupling, it reduces the degeneracy to 2+1. This is different from the 2-fold spin degenracy in absence of magnetic field as pointed out by Dr transport.

You may want to elaborate more on the bandgap vs degeneracy thing.. i.e. the context.
 
Quasi Particle said:
There seems to be a dependency from the width of the band gap. If it is much greater than the thermal energy, the semiconductor is called "not degenerated". I don't see how that fits in.
It does not fit in, because it is something very different.

A gas of fermions is called degenerate when the Fermi energy is smaller than the thermal energy. This is the case in metals.

In semiconductors, the gap is usually much larger than the thermal energy. The electron gas in the conduction band can then be treated with Boltzmann statistics.
 
Spin degenereracy happens when taking the spin-orbit band into account, each state will have 2 states, a spin up +1/2 and a spin down -1/2 in the conduction band. The valence bands are a whole different game.
Si and GaAs have different symmetry properties, Si has the symmetry group O_{h} which is has 48-fold symmnetry at the center of the Brilloun zone. GaAs transforms as T_{d} which is 24-fold symmentric. They may be cubic, but after that the similarities end. The T_{d} is a sub-set of the O_{h} group.
The conduction band minima for silicon is not at the center of the zone as it is for GaAs, but out along the <100> direction, thus reducing the symmetry of the conduction band even further to 12-fold symmetry, this is why there are 6 ellipsoids in the band structure. The conduction band minima is at the center of the Brillouin zone in GaAs, it has only a doubly degenerate s-state and graphically the band will be a single ellipsoid (each spin has its own, but they have the same energy and they overlap completely). QMrocks and Pieter Kuiper said the same thing a little more succinctly.

In the valence bands, if we ignore spin and the spin-orbit interactino for the moment, we have p-states, which are triply-degenerate. Include spin and the spin-orbit interation, we get two sets of states p_{3/2} (4-states) and p_{1/2} (2-states). At the center of the zone all the p_{3/2} are degenerate, and the p_{1/2} is separated from the otehr states by the spin-orbit splitting.

I did a lot of work in Si, Ge, GaAs amongst a bunch of other more exotic semi-conductor band structures for my dissertation so this is bringing back some memories of grad school.
 
So I seem to have mixed up the 2fold degeneracy of the conduction band with the 3fold (2fold) degeneracy of the valence band.

Thank you for your answers, it all makes more sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
81K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K