A Value of quintessence while studying black hole thermodynamics

Click For Summary
The discussion highlights that the quintessence state parameter $\omega$ is typically considered between -1 and -1/3 in black hole thermodynamics studies. The value $\omega = -1$ represents a cosmological constant with de Sitter expansion, while $\omega = -1/3$ corresponds to a dust phase. The exclusion of these two cases is significant because $\omega = -1$ leads to regular null surfaces that can extend into the past, unlike the null singularities associated with quintessence models. The varying values of $\omega$ result in different causal structures, impacting the thermodynamic behavior of black holes. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for advancing theories in black hole thermodynamics.
djymndl07
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
It is often seen in research papers that values of quintessence state parameter $\omega$ is taken between -1 and -1/3. However $\omega=-1$ corresponds to the cosmological constant and -1/3 corresponds to dust phase. Why these two cases are excluded in studying BH extended phase space thermodynamics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\omega = -1## corresponds to a cosmological constant, with de Sitter (exponential) expansion. ##-1 < \omega < -1/3## corresponds to quintessence-like stress energy -- these models have null singularities (i.e. genuine past singularities), whereas de Sitter models have regular null surfaces that can be smoothly extended (i.e. they can exist eternally into the past). ##w = -1/3## corresponds to inertial expansion. As you can see, different ##\omega## leads to different causal structures.
 
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...