Van der Waals EOS: Why Pc/Tc, and not Pc/Vc or Vc/Tc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maistral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Van der waals
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
maistral
Messages
235
Reaction score
17
TL;DR
The title.
As far as I know the van der Waals constants can be expressed as functions of Pc and Tc. Why is it so? Why is it not a function of Vc/Tc, or Pc/Vc?

Say for example, b = Vc/3. Why is this expressed in terms of Pc and Tc instead? Why is a also in terms of Pc and Tc, and not Vc? Is this just a matter of preference?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
maistral said:
Summary:: The title.

As far as I know the van der Waals constants can be expressed as functions of Pc and Tc. Why is it so? Why is it not a function of Vc/Tc, or Pc/Vc?

Say for example, b = Vc/3. Why is this expressed in terms of Pc and Tc instead? Why is a also in terms of Pc and Tc, and not Vc? Is this just a matter of preference?
Please show how you would reduce the van der Waals equation to dimensionless form.