Van travels over the hill described by y=(-1.5(1/1000)x^2 + 15)ft

  • Thread starter Thread starter vanquish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a van traveling over a hill described by the equation y=(-1.5(1/1000)x^2 + 15)ft. Participants explore the calculation of the van's velocity and acceleration components at a specific point (x=50ft) while grappling with the implications of the hill's slope and the van's constant speed of 75ft/s. The conversation includes technical reasoning, mathematical derivations, and attempts to clarify concepts related to derivatives and components of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the y-component of velocity as Vy=(-3x/1000) and expresses concern about its sign, noting that it appears negative when x is positive.
  • Another participant clarifies the relationship between Vy, Vx, and the slope of the hill, suggesting confusion between dy/dx and dy/dt.
  • Subsequent calculations lead to different values for Vx and Vy, with some participants suggesting the use of trigonometric functions to resolve the components based on an angle derived from the slope.
  • Discussions arise about the appropriateness of using the slope of the tangent versus the slope of the line joining the point to the origin.
  • Participants explore the second derivative of the hill's equation to find acceleration components, with varying interpretations of how to apply the equations for tangential and normal acceleration.
  • There is a suggestion to consider curvature and the relationship between arc length and velocity in the context of acceleration calculations.
  • Multiple participants express uncertainty about the correct equations to use for calculating acceleration components, leading to further exploration of the relationships between derivatives and motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the signs of the velocity components and the correct approach to calculating acceleration. There is no consensus on the final values for the components of acceleration, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct application of formulas and the interpretation of results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between different types of derivatives and their physical meanings, particularly in the context of motion along a curved path. There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on definitions that affect the calculations presented.

  • #31


a=(75ft/s^2)ut+(v2/ρ)un
At=75ft/s^2 ?
An=v^2/ρ=75^2/344.6=16.32
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
an looks correct, but at is wrong. Look in your textbook for the definition of acceleration, and compute at.
 
  • #33


the only things my textbook says about this are:
at=\dot{v}
or
atds=vdv
 
  • #34
OK, use the first equation to compute at.
 
  • #35


I think I got it, At=11.25
An=v^2/ρ=75^2/344.6=16.32

So when i calculated everything and used the angle i found before to project this information from the At and An directions into the Ax and Ay directions I get these numbers:
Ax=11.12
Ay=16.14
 
  • #36
an looks correct, but at is wrong. Show your calculations for at.
 
  • #37


according to my book:
atds=vdv
so at=vdv/ds
v=75m/s and dv/ds=-3x/1000
and since we want At at 50ft
dv/ds=-.15
so at=(75)(-.15)
 
  • #38
Statements by vanquish highlighted in blue.
at*ds = vt*dvt[/color] --true.
so at = vt*dvt/ds[/color] = (ds/dt)*dvt/ds = dvt/dt[/color] --true.
vt = 75 m/s[/color] --true, except for units; also, see the note I added to post 30.
and dv/ds = -3x/1000[/color] --false; dy/dx = -0.003*x.
and since we want at at 50 ft[/color]
dv/ds = -0.15[/color] --false.
so at = 75(-0.15)[/color] --false.

By the way, according to the international standard (ISO 31-0), numbers less than 1 must have a zero before the decimal point. E.g., 0.15, not .15.
 
  • #39
vanquish: Hint 6: If s = 75*t, can you compute ds/dt, and d2s/dt2?
 
  • #40


nvn said:
vanquish: Hint 6: If s = 75*t, can you compute ds/dt, and d2s/dt2?

ds/dt=75
d2s/dt2=0
 
  • #41
That's correct. What is another name for ds/dt and d2s/dt2?
 
  • #42


nvn said:
That's correct. What is another name for ds/dt and d2s/dt2?

velocity and acceleration?
 
  • #43
That's correct. I mean, can you think of the variable name for these quantities, in post 40?
 
  • #44


vt and at
 
  • #45
That's correct. Want to try to solve the problem now?
 
  • #46


well if at=0At=0
An=v^2/ρ=75^2/344.6=16.32

Ax=0
Ay=16.14
 
Last edited:
  • #47
That is correct for at and an. That is correct for ay, except for the sign. But ax is currently wrong. Try again.
 
  • #48


if at=0 then when i take the pojection of At along Ax i get
Ax=At*cos(8.5)
 
  • #49
That's right; but don't forget to also project an onto the x axis.
 
  • #50


nvn said:
That's right; but don't forget to also project an onto the x axis.
oh wow

Ax=At*cos(8.5)+An*sin(8.5)=-2.41 m/s2
Ay=-16.14 m/s2

EDIT: -2.41
 
  • #51
Always maintain four significant digits throughout all your intermediate calculations, then round only the final answer to three significant digits, unless the first significant digit of the final answer is 1, in which case round the final answer to four significant digits. You rounded your angle value too much. Try that one more time.
 
Last edited:
  • #52


I'll keep that in mind, but it accepted the answer. Thanks for sticking with me, I can be slow sometimes, I really appreciate it and I do think I learned from this, which is always a good thing.
 
  • #53
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K