Vanishing fermi level and cut off value in self energy

Physicslad78
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Guys, I have two questions:

(1) what does a vanishing Fermi energy mean?

(2) I have also calculated the phonon self energy for the electron phonon interaction in graphene. However in one of the papers, they state that one needs to subtract from this self energy the case of vanishing Fermi level and Born oppenheimer approximation ( where \omega=0 and large vector k and so they introduced a cut off energy equal to half of the \pi- band width. The reason behind that, as they say, is that this contribution is already included in the definition of the frequency \omega in graphene and has to be taken off to avoid double counting. Can anyone give me an idea of why this is the case...


Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, consider a metal (or graphene) with all the conduction electrons removed. Then you are left with the bare ionic cores which interact via the long range Coulomb interaction.
The vibrations will therefore start like plasma oscillations at a finite plasma frequency \Omega. When you add the electrons, these will screen the long range Coulomb interaction and the renormalized frequencies \omega starting at 0 will result. So you cannot use these frequencies in the calculation of the electron-phonon interaction as they already contain the electron-phonon interaction.
Maybe, appendix J in R. Mattuck, A Guide to Feynman Diagrams in the Many-Body Problem, Dover Publ. is helpfull.
 
Thanks very much for explanation...will consult the appendix...:)
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top