Solve Ehrenfest's Pendulum Equation | Can't Solve It

  • Thread starter Thread starter dRic2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Ehrenfest's Pendulum Equation, focusing on the dynamics of a pendulum where the length changes over time. Participants are attempting to analyze the Lagrangian mechanics involved in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive energy changes using the Lagrangian but questions the validity of their integration approach. Others point out the need for a total derivative instead of a partial derivative for proper integration. There is also a discussion about the implications of the length changing "slowly" and its potential impact on the solution.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions, and exploring different interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the derivative needed for integration, but there is no consensus on how to proceed with solving the integral itself.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the length of the pendulum changing slowly, which raises questions about the nature of the transformation and its implications for the energy states of the system. Participants are grappling with how to utilize this information effectively in their analysis.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Homework Statement
A simple pendulum hangs from a fixed pulley. The other end of the string is in the hand of an observer who pulls up the string slowly, thus shortening the length of the pendulum with uniform velocity. Show that, neglecting friction, the amplitude of the oscillations increases in the following manner. The change of the total energy from the position ##\theta = 0## to the next position ##\theta = 0## is given by $$\Delta E = - \frac 1 2 \frac {\Delta l} l E$$ where ##E## is the energy constant of the undisturbed oscillations.
Relevant Equations
$$\Delta E = - \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \frac {\partial L} {\partial t} dt$$
Well, using the above equation it should be easy... but I can't solve it :headbang::headbang:

$$ L = \frac 1 2 m (\dot l^2 + l^2 \dot \theta ^ 2) - mgl(1- \cos\theta)$$

then I guess

$$\int_{t_1}^{t_2} \frac {\partial L}{\partial t} dt = L(t_2) - L(t_1)$$

*Note*: since the variation ##\frac {\partial L}{\partial t}## is considered wrt to the variable ##t## alone, in the infinitesimal time ##dt##, ##\theta## and ##\dot \theta## are kept constant. So, even when integrating ##\theta## and ##\dot \theta## are kept constant wrt to time. Am I right ? If I choose ##t_2## to be the instant when ##\theta## is again equal to zero and, of course, ##\theta(t_1) = 0## then:

$$\Delta E = -\frac 1 2 m (\dot l^2 + l^2(t_2) \dot \theta ^2) - \frac 1 2 m (\dot l^2 + l^2(t_1) \dot \theta ^2)$$

and ##l^2(t_2) = (l(t_1) + \Delta l)^2 \approx l^2(t_1) + 2l \Delta l##. So, finally,

$$\Delta E = - m (l(t_1)*\Delta l \dot \theta ^2)$$

But ##E_1 = \frac 1 2 m l^2(t_1)* \dot \theta ^2 = E## is the energy constant of the undisturbed oscillations. So:

$$\Delta E = - 2 \frac {\Delta l} l E $$

which is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dRic2 said:
Am I right ?
No. The derivative is a partial derivative wrt t. In order to integrate it like that it must be the total derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
Oh right... what was I thinking!? Thank you very much.

But now I don't know how to solve that integral :confused:
 
It has been 3 days since I started thinking on this problem. Still I have no clue how to solve that integral. I think there should be an easier way... Can someone provide any suggestion/insight ?

I would appreciate a lot.
 
Note the keyword that tells you the length changes ”slowly”. What does this tell you about the solution?
 
Orodruin said:
Note the keyword that tells you the length changes ”slowly”. What does this tell you about the solution?
I think it means that the system undergoes a "reversible transformation", i.e. the pendulum goes from a state of equilibrium with energy ##E_0## to a state of equilibrium of energy ##E_0+dE##. But I'm not sure. And even if it was true, I do not know how to exploit this information
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K