Variation of Lagrange Density under field transformation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 1K views
Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys!

So I have a Lagrangian with two coupled fields like so:

[itex]\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi_{1})(\partial^{\mu}\phi_{1}) +\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi_{2})(\partial^{\mu}\phi_{2})-\frac{m_{1}^{2}}{2}(\phi_{1}\phi_{1})-\frac{m_{2}^{2}}{2}(\phi_{2}\phi_{2})-g(\phi_{1}\phi_{2})^2[/itex]

where g is a coupling constant.

So I have to find the variation of this lagrangian under the transformation

[itex]\delta\phi_{1}=\epsilon\phi_{2}, \delta\phi_{2}=-\epsilon\phi_{1}[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know what to do - do I just plug these into the Lagrangian? and if I do, how do I compute the new [itex]\partial_{\mu}\phi[/itex]?

Thanks a lot guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay so i plugged them in but I'm still a bit stuck.

For example consider this term:
[itex]\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}(\phi_{1}+\epsilon\phi_{2}))[/itex]

How do I compute this? (yes I am a noob with this stuff) Would it be equal to [itex]\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi_{1}+\epsilon\partial_{\mu}\phi_{2})[/itex]?

Also do I omit terms of order [itex]\epsilon^{2}[/itex]?

Thanks...
 
Dixanadu said:
Would it be equal to 12(∂μϕ1+ϵμϕ2)\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi_{1}+\epsilon\partial_{\mu}\phi_{2})?
Yes.
Dixanadu said:
Also do I omit terms of order ϵ2\epsilon^{2}?
Yes.
 
So i went through it all and here's where I am:

[itex]\begin{split}\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2}[(\partial_{\mu}\phi_{1})(\partial^{\mu}\phi_{1})] +\frac{1}{2}[(\partial_{\mu}\phi_{2})(\partial^{\mu}\phi_{2})] \\<br /> -\frac{m_{1}^{2}}{2}(\phi_{1}^{2}+2\epsilon\phi_{1}\phi_{2}) -\frac{m_{2}^{2}}{2}(\phi_{2}^{2}-2\epsilon\phi_{1}\phi_{2}) -g(\phi_{1}\phi_{2}-\epsilon\phi_{1}^{2}+\epsilon\phi_{2}^{2})<br /> \end{split}[/itex]

Is this looking okay...?

Thanks so much...
 
Last edited:
I get the following:
[itex] \mathcal{L}'=\frac{1}{2} \partial_{\mu} \phi_1 \partial^{\mu} \phi_1+\frac{1}{2} \partial_{\mu} \phi_2 \partial^{\mu} \phi_2-\frac{1}{2}m_1^2(\phi_1+2\epsilon \phi_2)\phi_1-\frac{1}{2}m_2^2(\phi_2-2\epsilon \phi_1)\phi_2-g[\phi_1\phi_2-2\epsilon(\phi_1^2-\phi_2^2)]\phi_1\phi_2[/itex]