Finding the equation of motion of a given Lagrangian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of motion for a scalar field described by a given Lagrangian. The Lagrangian includes terms that account for kinetic and potential energy, and the field is assumed to be spherically symmetric.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Euler-Lagrange equation to derive the equation of motion. There is a debate about the necessity of incorporating the volume element in the integral, with some questioning whether omitting it would lead to missing crucial factors in the Lagrangian density.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested that the equation of motion might simplify in spherical polar coordinates due to the symmetry of the potential, while others emphasize the importance of deriving the Euler-Lagrange equation first.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the implications of spherical symmetry in the problem setup, and participants are considering how this affects the formulation of the equations of motion.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Given the Lagrangian ##\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}##, where ##\Phi=\Phi(x)##, find the equation of motion of the system. Assume that the field ##\Phi## is spherically symmetric, i.e. ##\Phi = \Phi(r)##.

Homework Equations



The Euler-Lagrange equation of motion for a scalar field

The Attempt at a Solution



##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

The spherical volume element in ##4-##dimensional Euclidean space is ##d^{4}x = r^{3}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1})\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2})\ dr\ d\phi_{1}\ d\phi_{2}\ d\phi_{3}##.

Therefore, ##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{3}\ \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{2}\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2}) \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{1}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1}) \int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=(2\pi)(2)\bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}\bigg)\int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##.

Am I correct so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
failexam said:

Homework Statement



Given the Lagrangian ##\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}##, where ##\Phi=\Phi(x)##, find the equation of motion of the system. Assume that the field ##\Phi## is spherically symmetric, i.e. ##\Phi = \Phi(r)##.

Homework Equations



The Euler-Lagrange equation of motion for a scalar field

The Attempt at a Solution



##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

The spherical volume element in ##4-##dimensional Euclidean space is ##d^{4}x = r^{3}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1})\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2})\ dr\ d\phi_{1}\ d\phi_{2}\ d\phi_{3}##.

Therefore, ##S = \int d^{4}x \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi_{3}\ \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{2}\ \text{sin}(\phi_{2}) \int_{0}^{\pi}d\phi_{1}\ \text{sin}^{2}(\phi_{1}) \int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##

##=(2\pi)(2)\bigg(\frac{\pi}{2}\bigg)\int_{0}^{r}r'^{3}\ dr'\ \bigg(\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{r'}\Phi)^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\Phi^{3}+\frac{\alpha}{8}\Phi^{4}\bigg)##.

Am I correct so far?
Why do you bother with the volume element? Just apply the E-L equation to the Lagrangian density an you will directly get the equation of motion.
 
If I don't bother with the volume element, won't the crucial factor of ##r'^{2}## in the Lagrangian density be missing?
 
failexam said:
If I don't bother with the volume element, won't the crucial factor of ##r'^{2}## in the Lagrangian density be missing?
Hi,

The least action principle leads to the Euler-Lagrange equations which are conditions to what is integrated over all space. So there is no need to do anything with the volume element, ##d^4x##.

The E-L equations are

##\frac{\partial {\cal{L}}}{\partial \phi} - \partial_\mu \frac{\partial {\cal{ L}}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} = 0 ##
 
I understand that.

But wouldn't the equation of motion take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates, due to the radial symmetry of the potential?
 
failexam said:
But wouldn't the equation of motion take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates, due to the radial symmetry of the potential?

Yes, the equation of motion will take a simpler form in spherical polar coordinates. But as nrqed said, you should first derive the Euler-Lagrange equation and then impose the spherical symmetry (actually this just means to replace the d'Alembert operator by a double derivative with respect to "r").
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K