Variational Principle and Vectorial Identities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Euler-Lagrange equation for the principle of Minimum energy in elastic bodies, expressed as $$\int_{\Omega} \nabla^{(s)} u D (\nabla^{(s)}u)$$. The terms involved include the symmetric gradient $$\nabla^{(s)} = \frac{1}{2} (u_{i,j}+u_{j,i})$$ and a constant tensor $$D_{ijkl}$$. The challenge lies in demonstrating that this principle aligns with the Navier equations, specifically $$A \nabla (\nabla \cdot u) + B \nabla^{2} u = 0$$. The user is seeking assistance in deriving the necessary terms through integration by parts and variations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of variational principles in elasticity
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly symmetric gradients
  • Proficiency in applying integration by parts in functional analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation in the context of elasticity
  • Learn about the properties and applications of symmetric tensors in mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between variational principles and boundary value problems
  • Investigate advanced topics in vector calculus, focusing on divergence and Laplacian operators
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, graduate students, and professionals in applied mechanics, particularly those focusing on elasticity theory and variational methods in engineering.

muzialis
Messages
156
Reaction score
1
Hello there,

I am struggling in proving the following.
The principle of Minimum energy for an elastic body (no body forces, no applied tractions) says that the equilibrium state minimizes
$$\int_{\Omega} \nabla^{(s)} u D (\nabla^{(s)}u)$$
among all vectorial functions u satisfying the boundary conditions, where $$\nabla^{(s)} = \frac{1}{2} (u_{i,j}+u_{j,i})$$ and D is a constant tensor $$D_{ijkl}$$
The principle is expressed in terms of displacements, so one would expect that its Euler Lagrange Equation coinciides with the equlibrium equation of elasticity expressed in terms of displacements, the Navier equations, $$A \nabla (\nabla \cdot u) + B \nabla^{2} u = 0$$, A e B constants.
How to prove that? I am quite shaky in dimensions higher than 1.
I tried writing the first variation, after introducing $$u_{var} = U + \epsilon u$$ as
$$\int_{\Omega} \nabla^{(s)} u D (\nabla^{(s)}U)$$
and now by integration by parts I recover a Laplacian, as in Navier's equation (second term), but not the term $$\nabla (\nabla \cdot u)$$, any help would be so appreciated, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me rephrase the question, to make it clearer.
How to compute the Euler Lagrange equation of the functional
$$\int_{\Omega} \nabla^{(s)} u D (\nabla^{(s)}u)$$
where u is a vectorial function, $$\nabla^{(s)}u = \frac{1}{2} (u_{i,j}+u_{j,i})$$ and D is a (symmetric) constant tensor $$D_{ijkl}$$?
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K