Varying Gravitational Field - Invariant Tetrahedron?

In summary, the tetrahedron invariant under varying gravitational fields is a tetrahedron that is indistinguishable from Euclidean.
  • #1
Master J
226
0
Varying Gravitational Field - Invariant Tetrahedron??

Classical Theory of Fields, Landau Lifgarbagez, page 246:

"Strictly speaking, the number of particles should be greater than four. Since we can construct a tetrahedron from any six line segments, we can always, by a suitable definition of the reference system, make a system of four particles form an invariant tetrahedron. A fortiori, we can fix the positions relative to one another in systems of two or three particles."


This is a footnote to a section where the change in reltive spatial distances between bodies in a varying gravitational field is discussed. I have no idea what it means by it. Could someone explain? I have never been so puzzled!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Master J said:
Classical Theory of Fields, Landau Lifgarbagez, page 246:

"Strictly speaking, the number of particles should be greater than four. Since we can construct a tetrahedron from any six line segments, we can always, by a suitable definition of the reference system, make a system of four particles form an invariant tetrahedron. A fortiori, we can fix the positions relative to one another in systems of two or three particles."


This is a footnote to a section where the change in reltive spatial distances between bodies in a varying gravitational field is discussed. I have no idea what it means by it. Could someone explain? I have never been so puzzled!

First, analogy. On a 2-sphere (surface of a ball), there is no intrinsic way to distinguish that geodesic segment curves. Intrinsically, it is indistinguishable from a Euclidean straight line. Further, make two geodesic segments intersect at right angles. There is still no 'internal to 2-sphere' way to distinguish this from Euclidean. Add a third geodesic segment closing a triangle - now you can distinguish. The angles don't sum to 180, and the lengths don't match Pythagorean theorem.

In a semi-riemanning 4-manifold, it turns out (if you are free to choose your spacelike slices -i.e. coordinates) you can always have tetrahedron that is indistinguishable from Euclidean. Curvature of space-time does not force you to have a non-Euclidean tetrahedron. You need 5 points before you are forced to have some Euclidean violation.

Since your book leaves this to a footnote, see if you can find (in a library):

"Relativity, The General Theory" by J. L. Synge

He provides a detailed derivation of this fact.

I don't know of any readily available source with this derivation (e.g. MTW doesn't mention it).
 
  • #3


Sort of a sidenote (I'll have to admit to not being able to obtain Synge to read it either, though it sounds very interesting).

If you don't measure the angles, and only measure the sides, you'll need four points to detect the intrinsic curvature of the sphere's surface.

If you draw a Euclidean triangle on a plane with three sides a,b, and c (which must satisfy the triangle inequality), you can construct a triangle with sides a,b,c on the sphere with the same lengths (we're not measuring the angles for this exercise).

You start off with drawing a line segment that has the length of the 'a' side, then draw one circle of radius b centered at one end of the line segment you just drew, then draw another circle of radius c centered at the other end. The two circles will intersect at a pair of points (usually, only one point if the triangle is degnerate), giving you the desired triangle.

By only measuring lengths, you can still tell that the sphere is curved by drawing a square, which for the purposes of this exercise is defined as a quadrilateral with four equal sides and two equal diagonals.

When you draw the square, you'll find that on the sphere the ratio of the diagonal to the side is not sqrt(2).

If you take the sum of the squares of the diagonals, and subtract the sum of the squares of the sides, you'll get zero on a flat plane, and a non-zero number on a sphere, i.e if the side is s, the diagonal on a plane is sqrt(2) s, so the sum of the squares of the two diagonals is 4 s^2, the sum of the squares of the four sides (s^2+s^2+s^2+s^2).
 
Last edited:

1. What is a varying gravitational field?

A varying gravitational field refers to a situation where the strength and direction of the gravitational force changes at different points in space. This can occur due to the presence of massive objects, such as planets, stars, or black holes, which create a gravitational field that is stronger or weaker at different distances.

2. What is an invariant tetrahedron?

An invariant tetrahedron is a geometric shape that remains unchanged under certain transformations, such as rotations, reflections, or translations. In the context of a varying gravitational field, it refers to a specific shape of a tetrahedron that maintains its orientation and size, even when subjected to changes in the gravitational field.

3. How does the concept of an invariant tetrahedron relate to a varying gravitational field?

The concept of an invariant tetrahedron is used in the study of varying gravitational fields to understand how objects can maintain their shape and orientation despite changes in the gravitational force. By studying how an invariant tetrahedron behaves in different gravitational fields, scientists can gain insights into the nature of gravity and its effects on objects.

4. What are the practical applications of studying varying gravitational fields and invariant tetrahedra?

The study of varying gravitational fields and invariant tetrahedra has several practical applications, such as in the fields of aerospace engineering, astrophysics, and geology. By understanding how objects behave in different gravitational fields, scientists can design more efficient spacecraft trajectories, predict the movements of celestial bodies, and study the structure and composition of planets and other astronomical objects.

5. Can the concept of an invariant tetrahedron be applied to other physical phenomena?

Yes, the concept of an invariant tetrahedron has been applied to various physical phenomena, such as electromagnetic fields and quantum mechanics. In these contexts, it refers to the idea that certain properties or relationships between particles remain unchanged despite changes in the surrounding environment. This concept has helped scientists to develop new theories and models to explain complex physical phenomena.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
717
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
700
Back
Top