Vector and Axial vector currents in QFT

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
RicardoMP
Messages
48
Reaction score
2
I'm currently working out quantities that include the vector and axialvector currents ##j^\mu_B(x)=\bar{\psi}(x)\Gamma^\mu_{B,0}\psi(x)## where B stands for V (vector) or A (axialvector). The gamma in the middle is a product of gamma matrices and the psi's are dirac spinors. Therefore on the left I have a 1x4 matrix, on the left a 4x1 matrix and in the middle a 4x4 matrix, thus this current is just a number. Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually one write ##\psi(x)## as a column of four numbers. It's a socalled bispinor or Dirac spinor. Then by definition ##\overline{\psi}(x)=\psi^{\dagger}(x) \gamma^0##, and your ##\Gamma^{\mu}##'s are some product of ##\gamma##-matrices. For the vector current it's ##\gamma^{\mu}## for the axial vector current ##\gamma^{\mu} \gamma_5=-\gamma_5 \gamma^{\mu}## (where I use the usual commutation relations of ##\gamma_5## in (1+3)-dimensional Minkowski space; if you do dimensional regularization, sometimes there are extra rules for ##\gamma_5## making it easier to deal with anomalies, but that's more advanced stuff).

So what you multiply in the sense of matrix multiplication is a "row bi-spinor" ##\times## "##4 \times 4## matrix" ##\times## a "column bi-spinor", which gives a number.

Of course, in QFT the ##\psi## are operators, and thus also the ##j^{\mu}##'s become operators (transforming as a four-vector or an axial-four-vector operator, respectively).