Vector Calculus Identites Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around vector calculus identities, specifically focusing on the gradient of a scalar function defined in terms of a vector's magnitude. Participants are tasked with proving a relationship involving the gradient of a function and its dependence on the vector's length, as well as calculating gradients and cross products related to hyperbolic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the notation and meaning of derivatives with respect to the vector's magnitude and how to apply the chain rule in this context. Some participants suggest clarifying the notation used for the vector and its magnitude, while others explore the implications of the chain rule on the gradient calculation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the application of the chain rule and the correct interpretation of the gradient. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between the gradient and the scalar function's dependence on the vector's magnitude, but no consensus has been reached on the proof or calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the notation used for the vector and its magnitude, as well as the application of the chain rule in the context of differentiating a function of the vector's length. Participants are also grappling with the implications of these concepts on the calculations required in the homework statement.

jamesdocherty
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



let r (vector) =xi+yj+zk and r=sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2), let f(r) be a C2 scalar function.

1. Prove that ∇f = dr/df * vector r

2. Using part 1, calculate ∇ cosh(r^5), check answer by direct calculation

3. Using Vector Identities, calculate ∇ X (cosh(r^5)*∇f


Homework Equations



Vector Calculus Basic Identities

The Attempt at a Solution



i know ∇f=(df/dx,df/dy,df/dz)

but i have no idea what df/dr, i assuming its just d/dr * f but i don't even know what d/dr is ?

as i don't know part 1, i couldn't fully do part 2, but i did try the direct calculation and got

=(5x(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3/2 * sinh(x^2+y^2+z^2)^5/2,5y(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3/2 * sinh(x^2+y^2+z^2)^5/2,5z(x^2+y^2+z^2)^3/2 * sinh(x^2+y^2+z^2)^5/2)

for part 3, I'm pretty sure it equals 0 as after doing the determinant everything kind of cancels out, i can't be bothered typing this part it would take too long.

i'm not after an answer, if someone could just explain what d/dr is and if ∇f=(df/dx,df/dy,df,dz), how am i even meant to find it as there's no f function given in the question.

Thanks for any help i am really struggling
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamesdocherty said:

Homework Statement



let r (vector) =xi+yj+zk and r=sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2), let f(r) be a C2 scalar function.

1. Prove that ∇f = dr/df * vector r

Don't use the same letter for the vector and its magnitude. Let's use ##\vec R = \langle x,y,z\rangle## and ##r## for its length. You have written dr/df but what you mean is to prove ##\nabla f = \frac{df}{dr}\vec R##.

Now you have this differentiable function ##f(r)## and you want to calculate its gradient:$$
\nabla f(r) = \langle \frac \partial {\partial x} f(r),\frac \partial {\partial y} f(r),
\frac \partial {\partial z} f(r)\rangle$$Now use the chain rule to take those derivatives and see what happens.
 
thanks for the reply, doing that i got:

∇f(r)=(x/√(x^2+y^2+z^2),y/√(x^2+y^2+z^2),z/√(x^2+y^2+z^2))

but i am still confused as to prove ∇f=df/drR⃗, what is df/dr is that the f(r) function being derived in terms of r (the length) and then i have to multiply it by R vector.

Thanks again for any help, i have been trying to get this question for ages now
 
[Edit, added] I overlooked that you didn't apply the chain rule to your vector$$
\nabla f(r) = \langle \frac \partial {\partial x} f(r),\frac \partial {\partial y} f(r),
\frac \partial {\partial z} f(r)\rangle$$. Remember you are to differentiate a function of ##r## with respect to ##x,y,z## and you must use the chain rule. That's why your work below shows nothing about ##f(r)## in the answer, and it should. Do you understand the chain rule?

jamesdocherty said:
thanks for the reply, doing that i got:

∇f(r)=(x/√(x^2+y^2+z^2),y/√(x^2+y^2+z^2),z/√(x^2+y^2+z^2))

but i am still confused as to prove ∇f=df/drR⃗, what is df/dr is that the f(r) function being derived in terms of r (the length) and then i have to multiply it by R vector.

Yes. It is ##f'(r)##. Look at what you have above. Each component has ##\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}## in the denominator. That is ##r##. Factor it out of the vector as ##\frac 1 r##. That gives you ##\frac{\vec R}{r}## which is a unit vector in the ##\vec R## direction, which I would denote as ##\hat R##. Looking at that result, I would guess what you were really asked to show was that$$
\nabla f = \frac{df}{dr}\hat R$$which wasn't clear from your notation in the original post.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K