Vector cross product identity proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of the vector cross product identity, specifically the expression \(\nabla \times (v \times w) = v(\nabla \cdot w) - w(\nabla \cdot v) + (v \cdot \nabla)w - (w \cdot \nabla)v\). Participants explore methods to expand the left side of the equation and confirm the validity of their approaches. A suggested method involves recognizing \(\nabla\) as a differential operator and applying the vector identity \(a \times (b \times c) = b(a \cdot c) - c(a \cdot b)\) to simplify the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus concepts, particularly the cross product.
  • Familiarity with differential operators, specifically the gradient operator \(\nabla\).
  • Knowledge of vector identities and their applications in proofs.
  • Basic proficiency in manipulating vector expressions and derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the gradient operator \(\nabla\) in vector calculus.
  • Learn about vector identities, particularly the triple product identity.
  • Practice expanding vector expressions involving cross products and dot products.
  • Explore applications of vector calculus in physics, such as fluid dynamics and electromagnetism.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to understand or prove vector identities.

notReallyHere
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




\bigtriangledown\times\\(v\times w)= v(\bigtriangledown\cdot w) - w(\bigtriangledown\cdot v)+ (v\cdot\bigtriangledown)w - (w\cdot\bigtriangledown) v


I've tried expanding left side and get
[v1(dw2/dy+dw3/dz)-w1(dv2/dy+dv3/dz)]i +
[v2(dw3/dz+dw1/dx)-w2(dv3/dz+dv1/dx)]j +
[v3(dw1/dx+dw2/dy)-w3(dv2/dy+dv1/dx)]k

is this right way to start it? another way to attack it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
notReallyHere said:

Homework Statement




\bigtriangledown\times\\(v\times w)= v(\bigtriangledown\cdot w) - w(\bigtriangledown\cdot v)+ (v\cdot\bigtriangledown)w - (w\cdot\bigtriangledown) v


I've tried expanding left side and get
[v1(dw2/dy+dw3/dz)-w1(dv2/dy+dv3/dz)]i +
[v2(dw3/dz+dw1/dx)-w2(dv3/dz+dv1/dx)]j +
[v3(dw1/dx+dw2/dy)-w3(dv2/dy+dv1/dx)]k

is this right way to start it? another way to attack it?

You can try the following: First note that \nabla is a differential operator, so its action on the product is the sum of actions on each factor

\bigtriangledown\times\\(v\times w)= \bigtriangledown\times\\(V\times w) + \bigtriangledown\times\\(v\times W)

(I used capital letters to denote the factor on which \nabla acts in each term. The other factor can be treated as a constant). Then use the vector identity

a \times( b \times c) = b(a \cdot c) - c (a \cdot b)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K