Vector differential identity proof

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around proving a vector differential identity using index notation. Participants explore the identity's formulation and its implications within vector calculus, particularly in the context of physics and engineering applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in proving the identity: \nabla(\vec{A}\cdot\vec{B}) = \vec{A} \times (\nabla \times \vec{B}) + (\vec{A} \cdot \nabla)\vec{B} + \vec{B} \times (\nabla \times \vec{A}) + (\vec{B} \cdot \nabla)\vec{A} using index notation.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of using index notation, suggesting that the identity can be expressed in various forms, indicating that the chosen form may not be the most natural.
  • A participant expresses a preference for index notation due to its utility in developing vector identities but acknowledges uncertainty about its application in this specific case.
  • One participant provides a related identity and discusses the implications of using vector algebra identities to derive calculus identities, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the correct order of operations with differential operators.
  • Another participant expresses gratitude for the insights shared in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to prove the identity, and multiple viewpoints regarding the use of index notation and vector algebra remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential pitfalls in manipulating algebraic identities in the context of calculus, particularly regarding the order of differential operators, but these points are not fully resolved.

_jo_
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am a engineering student and I am currently upgrading my maths level on my own to follow physics courses. While reading a book, I came across a vector differential identity that I don't manage to prove using index notation.
The identity is the following:
[tex] \nabla(\vec{A}\cdot\vec{B}) =<br /> \vec{A} \times (\nabla \times \vec{B}) + (\vec{A} \cdot \nabla)\vec{B}<br /> + \vec{B} \times (\nabla \times \vec{A}) + (\vec{B} \cdot \nabla)\vec{A}[/tex]
Could you please give me a hint on how to prove this ?
Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you want to use index notation? In any case what makes this formula a bit strange is that it can be cast into many forms and that is in some sense not the natural one.

For example the identity

[tex]\mathbf{(a\times\nabla)\times b+a\nabla\cdot b=a\times(\nabla\times b)+(a\cdot\nabla)b}[/tex]

shows we can express each of those four terms in terms of the others
also we can chose to use or not use dyatic terms

two links
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=297027
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=273630
 
Thank you, I wanted to use index notation because it proved really usefull for developping vector identities. But if this identity's proof does not lend itself to this notation, I don't see the necessity to use it.

In one of your links, you posted this:

[tex] \nabla (\vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}) = \nabla_{\vec{A}}(\vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}) + \nabla_{\vec{B}}(\vec{A} \cdot \vec{B})[/tex]
[tex] \nabla_{\vec{A}}(\vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}) = B \times (\nabla \times \vec{A}) + (\vec{B} \cdot \nabla)\vec{A}[/tex]
[tex] \nabla_{\vec{B}}(\vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}) = A \times (\nabla \times \vec{B}) + (\vec{A} \cdot \nabla)\vec{B}[/tex]
[tex] \nabla(\vec{A}\cdot\vec{B}) = <br /> \vec{A} \times (\nabla \times \vec{B}) + (\vec{A} \cdot \nabla)\vec{B} + \vec{B} \times (\nabla \times \vec{A}) + (\vec{B} \cdot \nabla)\vec{A}[/tex]

But how do you develop the 2nd and 3rd lines from the partial gradient ?
 
[tex]\mathbf{\nabla_b (a\cdot b)=(a\times\nabla)\times b+a(\nabla\cdot b)=a\times(\nabla\times b)+(a\cdot\nabla)b}[/tex]

follows from the vector algebra identity

[tex]\mathbf{c(a\cdot b)=(a\times c)\times b+a(c\cdot b)=a\times(c\times b)+(a\cdot c)b}[/tex]

or in index form the identity (not guaranteed typo free)

δilδjkmjlεimkijδklijmεmlkikδjl

can be applied to

δilδjkajbk,l

Care must be taken when using algebra identities to deduce calculus identities, mainly because by normal convention differential operators are right acting so we must not change multiplication order. We would not like to make an error like

[tex]\nabla\cdot b=b\cdot\nabla[/tex]

It is also possible and convenient to change to bidirectional differential operators and back so that manipulations can be unrestricted.
 
Thanks a lot ! That was really helpful !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K