Vector Manipulation: Writing Cross Prod.

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manipulation Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the manipulation of vector expressions involving the cross product, specifically examining the identity \(\lvert\left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\right) \times \dot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert = \lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert \lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert\). A key point made is that the expression \(\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert\lvert\ddot{\mathbf{r}} - \dot{\mathbf{r}}\cdot\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert\) is invalid due to the mixing of vector and scalar quantities. The discussion suggests verifying the orthogonality of \(\dot{\mathbf{r}}\) and \(\dot{\mathbf{r}} \times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\) to establish the identity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and cross product operations
  • Familiarity with vector notation and scalar quantities
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and angles in vector analysis
  • Basic principles of linear algebra related to vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of the cross product in vector algebra
  • Study the geometric interpretation of vector orthogonality
  • Learn about vector identities and their proofs in advanced mathematics
  • Investigate applications of vector manipulation in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers interested in advanced vector manipulation and identity proofs in vector calculus.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Is it possible to write \(\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert\lvert\ddot{\mathbf{r}} - \dot{\mathbf{r}}\cdot\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert\) as \(\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert\)?

I want to show
$$
\lvert\left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\right) \times
\dot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert = \lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert
\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}
\times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert
$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first expression, as it stands, doesn't make sense. You cannot add $\ddot{\mathbf{r}}$ to $-\dot{\mathbf{r}}\cdot \ddot{\mathbf{r}}$, as the first is a vector and the second is a scalar. To show your identity, I'd try to look at the angle between certain vectors. That is, you know by the cross product rules that
$$ \left|( \dot{ \mathbf{r}} \times \ddot{ \mathbf{r}}) \times \dot{ \mathbf{r}} \right|
= \left| \dot{ \mathbf{r}} \right| \, \left| \dot{ \mathbf{r}} \times \ddot{ \mathbf{r}} \right| \sin(\theta),$$
where $\theta$ is the angle between $\dot{\mathbf{r}}$ and $\dot{\mathbf{r}} \times \ddot{ \mathbf{r}}$. If you can show that $\dot{\mathbf{r}}$ and $\dot{\mathbf{r}} \times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}$ are orthogonal, you'd be done, right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
825