Vector space and 3D flow field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of light emission, mass flow, and their mathematical representations in a three-dimensional context. Participants are exploring the implications of the inverse square law in relation to light intensity and mass flow density in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between light emission and distance, questioning how the surface density of mass flow relates to observed phenomena. There are attempts to clarify the mathematical expressions involved and their physical interpretations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and seeking confirmation of their understanding. Some have offered alternative perspectives on the mass flow and its implications, while others are ensuring clarity on the proportional relationships being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific mathematical formulations and assumptions about steady-state conditions, which may influence the interpretations being explored. The discussion does not resolve all questions but highlights areas of inquiry and clarification.

Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
1626483157058.png

Could someone explain the green highlight to me, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sum emits light of constant speed c with constant power. The emitted photons becomes more sparse at distant places as ##r^{-2}## so the sun is observed more dimmer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu
anuttarasammyak said:
The sum emits light of constant speed c with constant power. The emitted photons becomes more sparse at distant places as ##r^{-2}## so the sun is observed more dimmer.
Thanks for providing some physical intuition. But is it because the surface density of a mass flow is
$$\frac{\dot m}{A}=\frac{\dot m}{4\pi r^2}$$
?
 
Yes. What's wrong with it ?
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Yes. What's wrong with it ?
Nothing. Just making sure I understand where this proportionality comes from.
 
Another perspective: imagine two concentric spherical surfaces of radii ##\rho_1## and ##\rho_2## (##\rho_2 > \rho_1##) which bound a region ##R##. In steady state the mass contained in ##R## is constant, so the mass fluxes into the inner surface and out of the outer surface are equal: ##4\pi {\rho_1}^2 \delta_1 v = 4\pi {\rho_2}^2 \delta_2 v \, \implies \, \delta \rho^2 = \mathrm{constant}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K