Vector space and 3D flow field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the principles of light emission and mass flow in a three-dimensional vector space. It highlights that the intensity of light emitted from a source diminishes with distance according to the inverse square law, represented mathematically as ##r^{-2}##. The conversation also delves into the relationship between mass flow and surface density, confirming that the mass flow rate per unit area is given by the equation $$\frac{\dot m}{A}=\frac{\dot m}{4\pi r^2}$$. This establishes a clear understanding of how mass flux remains constant across concentric spherical surfaces in a steady state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse square law in physics
  • Familiarity with mass flow rate concepts
  • Basic knowledge of vector calculus
  • Experience with spherical coordinate systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the inverse square law in various physical phenomena
  • Explore the derivation of mass flow equations in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about vector fields and their applications in 3D space
  • Investigate the principles of conservation of mass in fluid systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students studying fluid dynamics or electromagnetic theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mathematical modeling of light and mass flow in three-dimensional spaces.

Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
1626483157058.png

Could someone explain the green highlight to me, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sum emits light of constant speed c with constant power. The emitted photons becomes more sparse at distant places as ##r^{-2}## so the sun is observed more dimmer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu
anuttarasammyak said:
The sum emits light of constant speed c with constant power. The emitted photons becomes more sparse at distant places as ##r^{-2}## so the sun is observed more dimmer.
Thanks for providing some physical intuition. But is it because the surface density of a mass flow is
$$\frac{\dot m}{A}=\frac{\dot m}{4\pi r^2}$$
?
 
Yes. What's wrong with it ?
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Yes. What's wrong with it ?
Nothing. Just making sure I understand where this proportionality comes from.
 
Another perspective: imagine two concentric spherical surfaces of radii ##\rho_1## and ##\rho_2## (##\rho_2 > \rho_1##) which bound a region ##R##. In steady state the mass contained in ##R## is constant, so the mass fluxes into the inner surface and out of the outer surface are equal: ##4\pi {\rho_1}^2 \delta_1 v = 4\pi {\rho_2}^2 \delta_2 v \, \implies \, \delta \rho^2 = \mathrm{constant}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K