Vector Space of Matrices: How to Define and Illustrate?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on defining and illustrating a vector space of matrices using formal notation. The user proposes a structure for the vector space, defining it as ((Fm x n, (Fm x n x Fm x n, Fm x n, +)), ((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)), (Fm x n x F, Fm x n, •)). They clarify operations for addition and scalar multiplication of matrices, referencing the definitions from Hoffman and Kunze. The user seeks validation for their formulation and expresses confusion regarding the precise definition of a set in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and linear algebra concepts
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and functions
  • Knowledge of fields in mathematics, specifically rational numbers
  • Experience with formal mathematical notation and definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about the formal definitions of sets in mathematical contexts
  • Explore Hoffman and Kunze's "Linear Algebra" for deeper insights
  • Investigate the implications of scalar multiplication in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the formal definitions and illustrations of vector spaces and matrix operations.

sponsoredwalk
Messages
531
Reaction score
5
You know the example "The space of functions from a set S to a field F" that's usually
given in a linear algebra text? Well they never give an example of the set they're working in
in detail so I defined the set as:

((S, (S x S, S, +)), ((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)), (S x F, F, •))

where:

+ : S x S → S defined by + : (f,g) ↦ (f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)
• : S x F → F defined by • : (f,β) ↦ (βf)(x) = βf(x).

&

(S, (S x S, S, +)) is an abelian group of vectors (functions),
((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)) is the field over which the operations take place,
(S x F, F, •) is the operation of scalar multiplication on vectors (functions).

My questions is: How would I illustrate a vector space of matrices akin to the notation
above?


Since a matrix is just the function f : (i,j) ↦ A(i,j) = Aij (as defined in Hoffman/Kunze anyway!).
I think the function is more generally defined as
f : Fm x n x Fm x n → Fm x n

To translate it into the above language I'm thinking:

((Fm x n, (Fm x n x Fm x n, Fm x n, +)), ((F, (F x F, F, +')), (F x F, F, °)), (Fm x n x F, Fm x n, •))

where

+ : Fm x n x Fm x n → Fm x n defined by + : (i,j) ↦ (A + B)(i,j) = A(i,j) + B(i,j) = Aij + Bij

• : Fm x n x F → Fm x n defined by • : ((i,j),β) ↦ (βA)(i,j) = βA(i,j) = βAij

But that seems weird tbh, is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
? You said you were going to define a set but what you define is not simply a set. A set would be something like "{a, b, c}". What would be the set of functions from that to, say, the field fo rational numbers?
 
I'm just going by the guidelines I've been given in this post:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3105066&postcount=7

Maybe the language was a bit loose, re-read the sentence:

"Well they never give an example of the set they're working in in detail so I defined the set as:"

as:

"Well they never give an example of the sets they're working in in detail so I defined the vector space as:"


and hopefully it will make more sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K