Vector subtraction with momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lolagoeslala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving vector subtraction related to momentum and changes in velocity. The original poster presents two velocities with specific directions and attempts to calculate the change in velocity using both component methods and the law of cosines and sines.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the law of cosines and sines to find angles related to vector subtraction. There is a focus on the ambiguity of angle solutions and the implications of using inverse trigonometric functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the angles derived from the calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of the sine function and the relationship between angles in vector problems. The conversation reflects a mix of confusion and clarification regarding the correct representation of angles and the implications of experimental data.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of experimental values and potential errors in angle measurements, which participants consider when discussing the validity of their calculations and results.

  • #31
Lolagoeslala said:
So the vector subtraction we did is correct..
i think its correct since it doesn;t change much correct?

It was the correct subtraction

Many people - in order to ensure they do subtractions in the "correct" order do the following

Vector A - Vector B = Vector A + (-Vector B)

In other words you reverse the (appropriate) vector and do the standard head to tail resultant.
That avoids which particular tail to tail vector you are after.
since in this problem you wanted the ~19 - ~16, you would reverse the 16 vector and add.

That confirms that the direction you drew it was correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Lolagoeslala said:
oh okayyy...

On my sheet with this question they give the equation

m2 = (v1`-v1 / v2 - v2`)m1

So does that mean the change in velocity should be with v2-v2`
not v2`-v2 ? that how we did it

The equation should read m2 = |v1'-v1 |/ |v2 - v2'| m1 where the numerator and denominator of the fraction are magnitudes of the velocity changes. So, it won't matter whether you write |v2 - v2'| or |v2' - v2|. They are equal.
 
  • #33
TSny said:
The equation should read m2 = |v1'-v1 |/ |v2 - v2'| m1 where the numerator and denominator of the fraction are magnitudes of the velocity changes. So, it won't matter whether you write |v2 - v2'| or |v2' - v2|. They are equal.

oh okay..
but see i found the experimental error...

so i did 27 - 32 / 32

and i get 15.6 % ...
but my teacher said u can have a maximum of 8% what is this? :(
 
  • #34
TSny said:
The equation should read m2 = |v1'-v1 |/ |v2 - v2'| m1 where the numerator and denominator of the fraction are magnitudes of the velocity changes. So, it won't matter whether you write |v2 - v2'| or |v2' - v2|. They are equal.

disagree. Absolute value not needed as one of the subtractions is written as final - initial while the other is written initial - final. This reinforces the idea that the gain in momentum of one object matches the loss in momentum of the other ie Δp1 = -Δp2, or if you prefer Δp1 + Δp2 = 0
It doesn't matter if you do include absolute value, but it is not necessary.
 
  • #35
I don't think it's very meaningful to calculate a % error for an angle. For example, suppose you had an angle that was supposed to be 2 degrees but your experimental value was 3 degrees. That's pretty good - only one degree off. That's just as good as an experimental value of 101 degrees for an angle that should be 100 degrees. But the % error in the first case would be calculated as 100%*(3-2)/2 = 50 %. In the second case, 100%*(101-100)/100 = 1%.

Are you sure that you weren't suppose to find the % error in the mass m1?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
PeterO said:
It doesn't matter if you do include absolute value, but it is not necessary.
Hello, PeterO.

We are considering the equation m2 = |v1'-v1 |/ |v2 - v2'| m1

If you take away the magnitude symbols, then you would be dividing by a vector. Is that possible?
 
  • #37
TSny said:
I don't think it's very meaningful to calculate a % error for an angle. For example, suppose you had an angle that was supposed to be 2 degrees but your experimental value was 3 degrees. That's pretty good - only one degree off. That's just as good as an experimental value of 101 degrees for an angle that should be 100 degrees. But the % error in the first case would be calculated as 100%*(3-2)/2 = 50 %. In the second case, 100%*(101-100)/100 = 1%.

Are you sure that you weren't suppose to find the % error in the mass m1?
what do you find the Error in mass 1?
 
  • #38
Lolagoeslala said:
what do you find the Error in mass 1?

Ach. I meant to write m2. I think you said you needed to find m2. So, I was thinking maybe that's what you had to determine a % error for.
 
  • #39
TSny said:
Ach. I meant to write m2. I think you said you needed to find m2. So, I was thinking maybe that's what you had to determine a % error for.

so you mean to say... wait...

do you mean like this m2-m1/m1 x 100%?
 
  • #40
Lolagoeslala said:
so you mean to say... wait...

do you mean like this m2-m1/m1 x 100%?

No, % error in m2 would be to compare your experimental value of m2 to the known value of m2 (assuming you have a known value). So, % error = (m2experiment - m2known)/m2known * 100. If you don't know the actual value of m2, then you can't get a percent error for it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K