Vectors and covectors under change of coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the computation of vector and covector transformations under changes of coordinates, specifically addressing the equation ##\sum a_{i}^{V}v^{i}_{V}=\sum a_{i}^{U}v^{j}_{U}##. The solution utilizes the Einstein summation convention to demonstrate the invariance of the inner product ##\sum v^{i}w^{i}## under coordinate transformations, emphasizing that the metric tensor changes with the coordinate system. The importance of distinguishing between vectors and points in curvilinear coordinates and manifolds is also highlighted, along with the necessity of defining notation clearly for reader comprehension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector and covector definitions
  • Familiarity with the Einstein summation convention
  • Knowledge of inner products in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of manifolds and curvilinear coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the metric tensor in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the transformation laws for vectors and covectors
  • Explore the implications of curvilinear coordinates in differential geometry
  • Investigate the role of vector fields in manifold theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are studying vector calculus, differential geometry, or anyone interested in understanding the implications of coordinate transformations in vector spaces.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



If ##\bf{v}## is a vector and ##\alpha## is a covector, compute directly in coordinates that ##\sum a_{i}^{V}v^{i}_{V}=\sum a_{i}^{U}v^{j}_{U}##.

What happens if ##\bf{w}## is another vector and one considers ##\sum v^{i}w^{i}##?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



##\alpha(\bf{v})=\alpha(\bf{v})##

##\implies (a_{i}^{V}\ \sigma^{i}_{V})(v^{k}_{V}\ \vec{e}_{k}^{V})=(a_{j}^{U}\ \sigma^{j}_{U})( v^{l}_{U}\ \vec{e}_{l}^{U})##,

where the Einstein summation convention has used to sum over the ##i##, ##j##, ##k## and ##l## indices and the left-hand side uses the ##U## coordinate system and the right-hand side uses the ##V## coordinate system, so that

##\implies a_{i}^{V}\ v^{k}_{V}\ \sigma^{i}_{V}(\vec{e}_{k}^{V}) = a_{j}^{U}\ v^{l}_{U}\ \sigma^{j}_{U}(\vec{e}_{l}^{U})##

##\implies a_{i}^{V}\ v^{k}_{V}\ \delta^{i}_{k} = a_{j}^{U}\ v^{l}_{U}\ \delta^{j}_{l}##

##\implies a_{i}^{V}\ v^{i}_{V}\ = a_{j}^{U}\ v^{j}_{U}##For the second part, again using the Einstein summation convention,

##v^{i}w^{i}=v^{i}w_{j}\delta^{ji}=\langle \vec{v},\vec{w}\rangle## for ##g^{ij}=\delta^{ij}##.

Now, ##g^{ij}=\delta^{ij}## is true only for Cartesian coordinates in flat space, so that the metric changes under a coordinate transformation. Therefore, the transformation of ##v^{i}w^{i}## depends upon the specific change of coordinates.

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first part is good. In the second part, I think they want you to show that ##v^i w^i## is invariant under a change of basis. Also if you want to talk about curvilinear coordinates (more generally curved spaces a.k.a. manifolds), you should distinguish vectors from points, and then one usually considers vector fields. There is a reason why a linear algebra course will not have a chapter on curvilinear coordinates. Yet to study curvilinear coordinates (and more generally, manifolds), you need to know about vector spaces. Take as an example, ##\mathbb{R}^2##. If this is thought as a two dimensional vector space, we don't talk about coordinate systems (since we don't care about general coordinate transformations), instead we talk about basis. But when you start to think of the Euclidean plane as a two dimensional manifold (albeit a very simple one), then you talk about general coordinate systems.You probably should state in the problem statement what the ##U## and ##V## subscripts/superscripts actually mean. It is just nicer for the reader if you make it a habit to state what your symbols mean, right after you write them down. An exception to this is if there is a conventional notation that you expect the reader to know. However since, the notation you used is not a widely used convention, you should state it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K