Is x an L-Tuple or a Member of an L-Tuple in ℝL+ Notation?

[Cinitiator]

Homework Statement

Let's say we have a notation:

Does it mean that x is an L-tuple? Also, if it does, does it have to have L members?
If it x isn't an L-tuple, does it mean that x belongs to an L-tuple? That is, x is inside of an L-tuple: (1, x, ... L)? And again, does it mean that that L-tuple has to have exactly L members?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

Googling

 

[micromass]

Homework Statement

Let's say we have a notation:

Does it mean that x is an L-tuple?

Yes.

Also, if it does, does it have to have L members?

Yes.

For example, typical members of \mathbb{R}^6 are x=(1,2,3,6,4,2). An element like (1,2,3) is not an element of \mathbb{R}^6.

 

[tiny-tim]

Hi Cinitiator!

Does it mean that x is an L-tuple?

Yes.

Also, if it does, does it have to have L members?

Yes!

A Cartesian product space, of L individual spaces, only has elements that are L-tuples.

If the individual spaces are all different, that's fairly obvious … it's the same even if the individual spaces are identical.

 

[janny]

Hi Cinitiator,

Does it mean that x is an L-tuple?

No, x \in ℝ^L₊ usually means that x is a column vector with L rows with real entries where the subscript + requires that all its entries are positive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Column_vector

A tuple is also a kind of array but such that the listed objects are ordered horizontally. It is usually notated like this:
L-Tupel: (n₁,n₂,...,n_L)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuple

Also, if it does, does it have to have L members?

Yes, exactly L entries (or alternatevely members)