Velocity of a 1-kg block after it has dropped 0.54 m

  • Thread starter Thread starter volcore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of a 1-kg block after it has dropped 0.54 m in a coupled system with a 3.5-kg block. The gravitational potential energy (GPE) change was calculated using the formula k = mgh, resulting in values of -18.522 J for the 3.5-kg block and 5.292 J for the 1-kg block. The participants clarified that the blocks cannot be treated independently due to their coupling, which affects their kinetic energy calculations. The correct approach involves considering the system's total potential energy change and how it translates into kinetic energy for both blocks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (GPE) and its calculation using k = mgh.
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy (KE) and the formula KE = 0.5mv².
  • Familiarity with coupled systems in physics, particularly in the context of pulleys.
  • Basic principles of Newtonian mechanics, including forces and acceleration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of coupled systems in mechanics, focusing on how they affect motion and energy transfer.
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in mechanical systems, particularly in the context of gravitational potential and kinetic energy.
  • Explore practical experiments involving pulleys and coupled masses to visualize the concepts discussed.
  • Review the relationship between mass, velocity, and kinetic energy to understand how energy is distributed in a coupled system.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as anyone interested in understanding energy transfer in coupled systems.

  • #31
vela said:
Faster than what?
Bad wording on my part, since kinetic energy is defined as 1/2 mv^2, wouldn't the 3.5kg block receive more of the system's kinetic energy since it has more mass, and both are moving at the same velocity?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
volcore said:
Bad wording on my part, since kinetic energy is defined as 1/2 mv^2, wouldn't the 3.5kg block receive more of the system's kinetic energy since it has more mass, and both are moving at the same velocity?

Yes, exactly.
 
  • #33
PeroK said:
Yes, exactly.
So where do I go from there?

Would this be right:
(2.5kg)g(0.54m) = 1/2 m1v1^2 + 1/2m2v2^2
1.35g = 3.75v1^2 + 0.5v2^2?
 
  • #34
volcore said:
So where do I go from there?

Would this be right:
(2.5kg)g(0.54m) = 1/2 m1v1^2 + 1/2m2v2^2
1.35g = 3.75v1^2 + 0.5v2^2?

What do you know about the relationship between ##v_1## and ##v_2##?

Note that you should keep the units in these equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
18
Views
3K