Velocity of a charged particle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the motion of a negatively charged particle released from a position outside a charged cylinder with a non-uniform density described by the function $$ \rho (r) = b \cdot e^{\lambda r} $$. Participants are exploring the relationship between electric fields, forces, and potential energy in the context of this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of electric fields both inside and outside the cylinder and how these relate to the forces acting on the charge. There is confusion regarding the integration of forces due to the variable nature of the electric field. Some participants suggest using potential energy concepts to analyze the problem, while others question the validity of the initial problem setup and the assumptions made about the charge's trajectory.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering different approaches to the problem, including potential energy calculations. There is recognition of the complexity introduced by the charge density and the electric field's behavior, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of integrating the electric field due to its dependence on the radial distance and the implications of the charge being negative. There is also mention of the potential at the axis of the cylinder and the assumption that the potential at infinity may not be zero in this scenario.

Kosta1234
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Velocity of charged particle
Relevant Equations
$$ \vec E \cdot \vec A = \rho (r) dV / \varepsilon _0 $$
Hi.
I will be glad if you can help me with a small problem.

I got a cylinder with a density $$ \rho (r) = b \cdot e^{\lambda r} $$, with radius $$ R $$.
If I let go a charge q < 0 from $$ R_0 $$ when $$ R_0 > R $$ , what will be the velocity that the charge will hit the axis of the cylinder.So I did the following:
I found the Electiric Field in space:

$$ \vec E = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda r -1)\cdot e^{\lambda r} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r<R$$
$$ \vec E = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r>R$$so that

$$ \vec F = \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda r -1)\cdot e^{\lambda r} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r<R$$
$$ \vec F = \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {{{(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r> R $$and now I want to use the second Newton's law:

$$ F = \frac {dv}{dt} $$
the problem is that I got an 'r' in the integral, can I solve the differential equation just like:

$$ \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})dt = dv $$

$$ (\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2}) t dt = dx $$
$$ t^2 / 2 = \frac {dx}{(\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})} $$I'm a little bit confused because the force is changing along the distance

Thanks!. sorry that the latex didn't work in the end.. I've not idea what's wrong there
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Kosta1234 said:
sorry that the latex didn't work in the end..
Doesn't matter: at that point you were off the rails already :smile:

First of all, check your relevant equation: you can't have a differential on one side only !

Then: is the problem statement correct ? How does a charge reach the axis instead of bumping into the cylinder at ##R## ?

Then: as you say, the force changes. Don't we have something more useful to consider in such a case ?

Would you do all this match for a charge q > 0 when asked for the ultimate speed, or use a different approach 😉 ?
 
Kosta1234 said:
$$ \vec F = \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r> R $$and now I want to use the second Newton's law:

$$ F = \frac {dv}{dt} $$
the problem is that I got an 'r' in the integral, can I solve the differential equation just like:

$$ \frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})dt = dv $$

$$ (\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2}) t dt = dx $$
$$ t^2 / 2 = \frac {dx}{(\frac {qb}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2})} $$I'm a little bit confused because the force is changing along the distance

Thanks!. sorry that the latex didn't work in the end.. I've not idea what's wrong there Three {{{ instead of one
 
I forgot to say that the cylinder is not solid.

and yes, my relevant equation is:

$$ \int \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \iiint \frac {\rho (r) dV}{\varepsilon _0 } $$

I tried a different approach now..
to calculate the potential in space, and from that the electric potential energy.

and then $$ \Delta U = \frac {1}{2}mv^2 $$
so that is:
$$ q \cdot ( \phi (0) - \phi(R_0) ) = \frac {1}{2}mv^2 $$

I think there is a problem with because there will be $$ ln(r) $$ in the phrase of the potential, and I can't put there r=0
 
Muuuuuch better ! And you know the potential at the axis, don't you ?
 
Hmm

If I got those two:

$$ \vec E_1 = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda r -1)\cdot e^{\lambda r} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r<R $$
$$ \vec E_2 = \frac {b}{\varepsilon _0 r} \cdot \frac {(\lambda R -1)\cdot e^{\lambda R} +1}{\lambda ^2} \hat r $$ when $$ r>R $$so I can calculate the potential

$$ \phi (0) = -\int_{R_0}^{R} {E_2 \cdot dr} - \int_R^0 E_1 \cdot dr $$
$$ \phi (R_0) = -\int_{\infty}^{R_0} E_2 \cdot dr $$
$$ U = q(\phi(0) - \phi(R_0) = 1/2mv^2 $$

What do you say?
 
BvU said:
And you know the potential at the axis, don't you ?
Perhaps that was a bit optimistic with the given charge density.

I agree with the relevant equation. Left is E A -- how do you work out the right for r = R ?
 
BvU said:
Left is E A -- how do you work out the right for r = R ?
never mind -- I'm a bit slow, but I'm with you. ##\phi## is the way to go.
 
But not towards infinity -- this is one of the cases where V can't be zero at infinity.
 
  • #10
Oh ok. so I can say that in general point $$ \phi(R_0) = 0 $$ so the answer will be:
$$ q \cdot \phi(0) = 1/2mv^2 $$ ?
 
  • #11
I think so, yes. Or at 0, or at ##R## -- all you need is a potential difference
 
  • #12
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
902
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K