Calculating Earth's Orbital Velocity from Varying Distance to the Sun

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Earth's orbital velocity based on its varying distance from the Sun, specifically between 1.47 and 1.52 x 1011 m. Participants explore the implications of gravitational forces and energy conservation in the context of orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy equations to relate kinetic and potential energy at different points in the Earth's orbit. There are attempts to clarify the distinction between tangential and angular velocity, and some participants express uncertainty about the appropriate equations to use.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with some participants suggesting the use of angular momentum and others questioning the assumptions made in the original equations. Guidance has been offered regarding the need for additional relationships between velocity and distance, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the problem does not specify whether to find angular or tangential velocity, leading to confusion. Additionally, there are references to Kepler's laws and the conservation of angular momentum, indicating a mix of foundational concepts being applied to the problem.

toothpaste666
Messages
517
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


Given that the Earth's distance from the sun varies from 1.47 to 1.52x10^11m, determine the minimum and maximum velocities of the Earth in it's orbit around the sun.


Homework Equations



F=G\frac{m1m2}{r^2}

E=K+U ?

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the way to do this is with K1+U1 = K2+U2 , where one side of the equation is the Earth at its closest point to the sun and the other side is the Earth at its farthest point. Let Me = mass of earth, Ms = mass of sun, Rn = distance at nearest point, Rf= distance at farthest point, Vn = velocity at nearest point, Vf = velocity at farthest point.

K1+U1 = K2 + U2

\frac{MeVn^2}{2} + G\frac{MsMe}{Rn} =\frac{MeVf^2}{2} + G\frac{MsMe}{Rf}

the Me's cancel. to solve for Vn replace Vf with \frac{2piRf}{T}

\frac{Vn^2}{2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rn} =\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf}

\frac{Vn^2}{2} =\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf} - G\frac{Ms}{Rn}


Vn^2 = 2(\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf} - G\frac{Ms}{Rn})

Vn = (2(\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf} - G\frac{Ms}{Rn}))^\frac{1}{2}

then after plugging in I would go back and solve for Vf. Would this give me the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, one thing I want to say is that the Earth is revolving, not translating. You don't want 1/2 mv^2, you want 1/2 Iw^2 for your KE, and I'm sure Mr^2 is good enough for I. other than that I think you're on the right track.
 
... I was just looking at your eq. again, and I'm not sure what you're doing with the 2pi*r/T, that is w, but I don't think you're looking at the KE in this situation correctly.
 
Ok cool thanks. What does Iw represent?
 
I was using the equations for circular motion where v = 2(pi)r/T . I am only vaguely sure of what I am doing though.
 
ok, looking again (again)... that'll get you the tangential velocity, but not angular, I'm not sure what you're after exactly.

Also, I think it's good practice to start with the angular and convert over, seeing as you have KE as a result of rotation, not translation. I think that will get you the correct result, though (this time).
 
Iw is moment of inertia * angular velocity
 
what exactly is the angular velocity? I am not sure If I am up to that yet in my physics class. The section this problem was from was covering universal gravitation as well as kepler's laws. The question just says find the maximum and minimum velocities it doesn't specify between angular or tangential. The KE I am using won't work?
 
well angular velocity is the rate of revolution measured in radians/seconds, or also commonly 1/seconds (radians are funny that way). w = 2pi/T =v/r, so what you're doing will work I think.
 
  • #10
just out of curiosity is it a general physics course?
 
  • #11
Suppose it was a perfectly circular orbit around the sun, at the average distance of 1.495x10^11 m. Would you know how to determine the tangential velocity then (say using F = ma)? What value would you get for the tangential velocity?

Chet
 
  • #12
toothpaste666 said:

Homework Statement


Given that the Earth's distance from the sun varies from 1.47 to 1.52x10^11m, determine the minimum and maximum velocities of the Earth in it's orbit around the sun.

Homework Equations



F=G\frac{m1m2}{r^2}

E=K+U ?

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the way to do this is with K1+U1 = K2+U2 , where one side of the equation is the Earth at its closest point to the sun and the other side is the Earth at its farthest point. Let Me = mass of earth, Ms = mass of sun, Rn = distance at nearest point, Rf= distance at farthest point, Vn = velocity at nearest point, Vf = velocity at farthest point.

K1+U1 = K2 + U2

\frac{MeVn^2}{2} + G\frac{MsMe}{Rn} =\frac{MeVf^2}{2} + G\frac{MsMe}{Rf}

the Me's cancel. to solve for Vn replace Vf with \frac{2piRf}{T}

\frac{Vn^2}{2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rn} =\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf}

\frac{Vn^2}{2} =\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf} - G\frac{Ms}{Rn}Vn^2 = 2(\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf} - G\frac{Ms}{Rn})

Vn = (2(\frac{2pi^2Rf^2}{T^2} + G\frac{Ms}{Rf} - G\frac{Ms}{Rn}))^\frac{1}{2}

then after plugging in I would go back and solve for Vf. Would this give me the correct answer?
Using ##V_f = \frac{2\pi R_f}{T}## isn't correct. This assumes that the Earth covers a distance of ##2\pi R_f## in one year, which would be true if it followed a circular path of radius ##R_f##, but the Earth covers less distance because it moves toward the Sun.

You have two unknowns, so you're going to need another equation. You used conservation of energy already (though the sign of the potential energy is wrong). What's another conserved quantity you can use?
 
  • #13
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
well, one thing I want to say is that the Earth is revolving, not translating. You don't want 1/2 mv^2, you want 1/2 Iw^2 for your KE, and I'm sure Mr^2 is good enough for I. other than that I think you're on the right track.
This is completely wrong. You've misread the problem.
 
  • #14
vela said:
Using ##V_f = \frac{2\pi R_f}{T}## isn't correct. This assumes that the Earth covers a distance of ##2\pi R_f## in one year, which would be true if it followed a circular path of radius ##R_f##, but the Earth covers less distance because it moves toward the Sun.

You have two unknowns, so you're going to need another equation. You used conservation of energy already (though the sign of the potential energy is wrong). What's another conserved quantity you can use?

I think energy is the only conserved quantity I know so far. The only one that definitely stays the same over time. Also, do you mean another equation involving velocity?
 
  • #15
What about angular momentum?

ehild
 
  • #16
It's a central force, so angular momentum is conserved.
 
  • #17
I haven't learned about momentum yet. There is no other way to solve this?
 
  • #18
Use F=ma to get another relationship between V and R.
 
  • #19
toothpaste666 said:
I haven't learned about momentum yet. There is no other way to solve this?

You certainly know Kepler's Laws. What do the first two say?

ehild
 
  • #20
do i have to use T^2 = r^3
 
  • #21
no wait that's the third. the first one says that the orbits of planets around the sun are ellipses. The second law says that each planets moves so that a line from the planet to the sun sweeps out equal areas in equal time
 
  • #22
toothpaste666 said:
no wait that's the third. the first one says that the orbits of planets around the sun are ellipses. The second law says that each planets moves so that a line from the planet to the sun sweeps out equal areas in equal time

That is it, the second one. What are the areas the line from the planet to the Sun sweeps in one second when the planet is nearest and when it is farthest? For that short time you can consider those parts of the ellipse as they were sectors of circles. How do you calculate the area of a circular sector?

ehild
 
  • #23
the area would be (theta * r^2)/2 and since it is going from the farthest point to the nearest point its only sweeping out half the ellipse so theta would be pi?
 
  • #24
I think using F=ma would be simpler.
 
  • #25
toothpaste666 said:
the area would be (theta * r^2)/2 and since it is going from the farthest point to the nearest point its only sweeping out half the ellipse so theta would be pi?

I mean only thin sectors, swept by the radius in 1 second at the nearest and farthest points.
You know that the area of a circular sector is sr/2, where s is the length of arc and r is the radius of the circle. Supposing the speed of the planet is v, what is the length s it covers in 1 s?

ehild
 

Attachments

  • kepler2.JPG
    kepler2.JPG
    7.7 KB · Views: 462
  • #26
I'm sorry guys Idk why I'm having so much trouble with this. Can I use V=D/T where D = s (the distance swept out) and V = the velocity of Earth at whichever of the two points you are looking at. T = 1 so V will just be equal to s ?
 
  • #27
toothpaste666 said:
I'm sorry guys Idk why I'm having so much trouble with this. Can I use V=D/T where D = s (the distance swept out) and V = the velocity of Earth at whichever of the two points you are looking at. T = 1 so V will just be equal to s ?

Yes, s=vt and t=1. The areas are equal. What relation follows from that between the speeds and distances from Sun?

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #28
that the velocities are also equal?
 
  • #29
Don't just guess. Work it out based on what ehild said.
 
  • #30
ok so the area of one sector is

\frac{s_1 R_n}{2}

the other is

\frac{s_2 R_f}{2}

the areas are equal so

\frac{s_1 R_n}{2} = \frac{s_2 R_f}{2}

s_1 R_n = s_2 R_f

s1 = Vn and s2 = Vf

V_n R_n = V_f R_f

V_f = \frac{V_n R_n}{R_f}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K