Velocity Problem of neutron star

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the velocity of an object falling near the surface of a neutron star, given its mass and radius. The gravitational force is assumed to be constant over the distance of the fall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of gravitational force equations and question the necessity of the mass of the falling object in the calculations. There are concerns about the numerical results obtained and the interpretation of the equations used.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the calculations and assumptions made in the original post. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the forces and the masses involved, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information regarding the mass of the falling object, which is affecting the calculations. Participants are also discussing the implications of using the gravitational force equation without this mass.

Cursed
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A neutron star has a mass of 2.0 x 1030 and a radius of 5.0 x 103. Suppose an object falls from rest near the surface of the star. How fast would it be moving after it had fallen a distance of 0.010 m? (Assume that the gravitational force is constant over the distance of the fall, and that the star is not rotating.)

Homework Equations



(a) F=(G*m1*m2)/r2
(b) F=ma
(c) V2=Vo2 + 2ax


The Attempt at a Solution



Using equation (a), I found the force to be about 1.068 x 1043 N

Using equation (b), I found the acceleration to be 5.338 x 1012

Using equation (c), I found the velocity to be 231042.68 m/s after the object had fallen a distance of 0.01 m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the question? b) looks fine. I don't see how you got a) since you didn't give a mass for the object. c) doesn't look correct numerically.
 
Dick said:
What's the question? b) looks fine. I don't see how you got a) since you didn't give a mass for the object. c) doesn't look correct numerically.

Yeah, (c) didn't look right.

For (a), I squared the mass because I only had one mass given, and that was 2 x 1030. Then I divided it by the distance squared, which I used 5 x 103 for, and multiplied it by G.

F = (G*M2)/r2
 
If you did that then the force in a) is the force between two neutron stars with centers 5000m apart. For c), I don't mean that it's REALLY wrong, it just looks like somebody forgot a 2.
 
Yeah you don't want to be doing any mass squaring on this one. What happens is you set F=ma in the Gm1m2/r^2 equation and the m of the falling object cancels out, so it's not needed to solve the problem.
 
Now I'm confused. :s

So what equation(s) would I use to go about solving this?
 
If M is the neutron star mass and m is the mass of the object, F=G*M*m/r^2. (If they don't give you a value for m, that's all you can say). Since we also have F=m*a, a=G*M/r^2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K