Vena contracta in orifice plates

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaiG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orifice Plates
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the diameter of the vena contracta in gas and vapor flows through orifice plates. The coefficient of contraction (Cc) is defined as the ratio of the area of the vena contracta to the area of the orifice, typically approximated at 0.62 for sharp edge orifices. However, adjustments may be necessary to account for fluid compressibility, using the expansion factor (Y) in calculations. The user expresses concerns about the reliability of approximating Cc, as small variations in process variables can significantly impact noise calculations in orifice plates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orifice plate flow dynamics
  • Familiarity with the coefficient of contraction (Cc)
  • Knowledge of fluid compressibility effects
  • Basic principles of acoustic noise measurement in fluid systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating the vena contracta diameter in orifice plates
  • Explore the impact of compressibility on flow measurements in gas and vapor systems
  • Investigate advanced techniques for noise prediction in fluid systems
  • Learn about the expansion factor (Y) and its application in flow calculations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics specialists, and acoustic analysts involved in the design and analysis of orifice plates and flow measurement systems.

DaiG
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, does anybody know how to find the diameter of the vena contracta in gas/vapour flows in orifice plates?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is given by the coefficient of contraction Cc = Area vena contracta / Area Orifice. The value is usually about 0.62 for a sharp edge orifice. These results may need correction for the compressibility of the fluid. To a first approximation, multiply Cc X Y where Y is the expansion factor.
 
Yea, I am aware of this method but concern is with the coefficeint Cc. Usually an approximation would be good enough and 0.61 to 0.64 usually does the trick. My issue is I am trying to develop a method for calculating a value of noise in orifice plates. approximating Cc isn't a reliable method for me because my final decibel value is thrown substantially if certain process variable differ by 0.01 decimal places and the vena contracta velocity and area are troubled areas for me. Thanks anyway though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K