Verify whether eigenfunction or not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reshma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfunction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a given wavefunction, specifically the normalized wavefunction of a particle in a one-dimensional box, is an eigenfunction of the momentum operator. The wavefunction is expressed in terms of sine functions, and participants are exploring its properties in relation to quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the definition of an eigenfunction and questioning whether the wavefunction meets this definition. There is a discussion about rewriting the sine function in complex form to facilitate understanding. Some participants are analyzing the implications of the wavefunction not returning to its original form under the momentum operator.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and suggestions for reformulating the wavefunction. There is a general agreement that the wavefunction does not behave as an eigenfunction of the momentum operator, but the reasoning behind this is still being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the wavefunction representing a particle that could be moving in either direction, which adds complexity to the analysis of its eigenfunction status.

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
The wavefunction of a particle moving inside a one dimensional box of length L is non-zero only for 0<x<L.
The normalised wavefunction is given by:
[tex]\psi (x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\sin \frac{n\pi x}{L}[/tex]
Is this wavefunction an eigenfunction of the x-component of the momentum operator [itex]\vec p = -i\hbar \vec \nabla[/itex]

My work:
I computed the partial derivative of [itex]\psi[/tex] with respect to 'x'. I got:<br /> [tex]\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\left(\frac{n\pi}{L}\right)\cos \frac{n\pi x}{L}[/tex]<br /> I don't think it is an eigenfunction of the operator but I don't know how to justify my answer. Help needed...[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, what is the definition of an eigenfunction? Does this fit the definition? Since your operator involves an i you might want to put the function in complex form:
[tex]sin(\frac{n\pic x}{L})= \frac{e^{\frac{n\pi x}{L}}- e^{-\frac{n\pi x}{L}}}{2}[/tex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The function should return from the operator exactly as is, except for a multiplicative scaling factor. It does not in this case.
 
Well there you go, it's not an eigenfunction then. And you should not expect it to be an eigenfunction, because that wavefunction represents a particle which could either be traveling to the right or to the left.

If you rewrite the sine function in terms of complex exponentials as HallsofIvy suggested, you will see explicitly that your wavefunction is a superposition of two momentum eigenstates.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K