Verifying a solution of the diffusion equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on verifying a solution to the diffusion equation, specifically addressing the application of the gradient operator (∇) and the Laplacian in spherical coordinates. The user, Chet, seeks clarification on whether the gradient is defined as ∇F = Fx + Fy, where Fx = ∂F / ∂x and Fy = ∂F / ∂y. Additionally, Chet inquires about the correct formulation of the Laplacian in spherical coordinates, as it differs from its Cartesian counterpart.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the diffusion equation
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, specifically the gradient and Laplacian operators
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinate systems
  • Experience with partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definition and properties of the gradient operator in vector calculus
  • Study the formulation of the Laplacian in spherical coordinates
  • Explore examples of solving the diffusion equation in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the implications of using Cartesian versus spherical coordinates in mathematical modeling
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are working on problems related to the diffusion equation and require a deeper understanding of vector calculus and coordinate transformations.

Raj Batra
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is my attempt at the solution. I have been told that the given function is a solution. I just need to prove it. As you can see that I am stuck. What am I doing wrong?
i0pxp.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the definition of the ∇ operator here?

Is ∇F = Fx + Fy, where Fx = ∂F / ∂x and Fy = ∂F / ∂y?

Similarly, is ∇2 supposed to be the Laplacian in cartesian coordinates?
 
The Laplacian is supposed to be evaluated in spherical coordinates in this problem. What is the equation for the Laplacian in spherical coordinates?

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K