Very Basic QM problem: Commuter of position and momentum operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the commutation relation between position and momentum operators in quantum mechanics, specifically the expression [x, p] = iħ. The user initially miscalculated the result as -iħ due to a misunderstanding of the product rule in differentiation. A correction was provided, emphasizing the importance of proper application of the product rule when differentiating the product of functions. The correct calculation confirms that the commutation relation yields iħ, aligning with standard quantum mechanics principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals, specifically operators.
  • Familiarity with the concept of commutation relations.
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques, particularly the product rule.
  • Basic grasp of complex numbers and their properties in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical formalism of quantum operators and their properties.
  • Explore the implications of commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Review differentiation techniques in calculus, focusing on the product rule and its applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of operator algebra and the foundational principles of quantum theory.

Pinu7
Messages
275
Reaction score
5
I'm not exactly sure if this belongs in introductory or advanced physics help.

Homework Statement


In my book, the author was explaining the proof of the Uncertainty relation between po
position and momentum.

It simply stated that [x,p]= ih(h is reduced)
But when I tried to verify it I got -ih. I now it would give the same result, but it still won't be good for me to mess up a fundamental concept so early.

Homework Equations


[tex]\hat{p}[/tex]=-ih d/dx
[tex]\hat{x}[/tex]=[tex]\hat{x}[/tex]
[A,B]=AB-BA

The Attempt at a Solution


[x,p][tex]\left|\psi[/tex]>=(xp-pa)[tex]\left|\psi[/tex]>=xp[tex]\left|\psi[/tex]>-pa[tex]\left|\psi[/tex]>

It would become this:
-ihx d[tex]\psi[/tex]/dx -ihx-(-ihx d[tex]\psi[/tex]/dx)=
-ihx

Which is not the answer my book gave me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer isn't right. The px part means you have to differentiate x*psi. Use the product rule.
 
Hello, Pinu7 ! I wish I could do some help.

Firstly, I'd like to tell you that, the given attempt solution is incorrect, for the sign of $i\hbar x$ is plus rather than minus. It is a slight carelessness in extending the derivative of product. Now, I will re-perform the calculating in details. And please translate the tex codes yourself.

For one-dimensional simplified case, as put forward in the question (or for the x-component of 3-dimensional analyses):
$$
\hat{x}=x
$$
$$
\hat{p}= -i\hbar \frac{d}{dx}
$$
Hence, with the quantum Poisson bracket operator:

[\hat{x}, \hat{p}] \phi = \hat{x} \hat{p} \phi - \hat{p} \hat{x} \phi

= -i\hbar x \frac{d}{dx} \phi -( -i\hbar \frac{d}{dx} (x \phi))

= -i\hbar x \frac{d}{dx} \phi -( -i\hbar \phi -i\hbar x \frac{d}{dx} \phi ) (Look Out! Your Carelessness Happens Here!)

= i\hbar \phi

Just as the textbook gives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K