Vibrating String under Gravity: Solutions & Considerations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity String
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
Gear300
Messages
1,212
Reaction score
10
Consider a string vibrating (with small amplitude) against a transverse damping force b(∂ψ/∂t) that acts per unit length. Also consider the effect of a transverse driving Fy that acts per unit length.

The equation of motion I got was
τ02xψ - b∂txψ + ∂xF(x,t) = λ02tψ ,
where τ0 is the tension along the string and λ0 is the linear mass density.

Now consider a string of length L in equilibrium under gravity.

The equation of motion thus becomes
τ02xψ - mg = 0 .
The solution I get from this is parabolic, whereas from what I remember, the form for a hanging chain/cable/wire/etc... is a hyperbolic cosine (cosh). I was wondering whether I made a mistake somewhere, or that this is a result of the small amplitude condition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gear300 said:
The solution I get from this is parabolic, whereas from what I remember, the form for a hanging chain/cable/wire/etc... is a hyperbolic cosine (cosh). I was wondering whether I made a mistake somewhere, or that this is a result of the small amplitude condition.

If you assume the loading on the cable is uniform in the horizontal direction, the solution is a parabola.

If you assume the loading comes from the weight of the cable, the loading per horizontal distance is NOT uniform, because it depends on the slope of the cable at each point. For that case, the solution is a catenary.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Catenary.html
 
AlephZero said:
If you assume the loading on the cable is uniform in the horizontal direction, the solution is a parabola.

If you assume the loading comes from the weight of the cable, the loading per horizontal distance is NOT uniform, because it depends on the slope of the cable at each point. For that case, the solution is a catenary.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Catenary.html

Thanks. I just realized that might have been the case. My force was not done correctly.