Virtual Particles: Positive or Negative Energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of virtual particle pairs in the vacuum, specifically addressing the concepts of positive and negative energy particles. It touches on theoretical implications and interpretations related to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and Hawking radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that virtual particle pairs are often described as consisting of a particle and its antiparticle, both having positive energy borrowed from spacetime.
  • Another participant highlights the confusion surrounding Hawking radiation, where one particle is referred to as having negative energy.
  • A participant claims to be writing a paper aimed at resolving the issue of negative-energy particles in the context of Hawking radiation, indicating ongoing exploration of the topic.
  • A link to a paper is provided, suggesting further reading on the subject, although its content is not discussed in detail within the thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express confusion and differing interpretations regarding the energy characteristics of virtual particles, particularly in relation to Hawking radiation. No consensus is reached, and multiple viewpoints remain present.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the definitions of positive and negative energy in this context, as well as the implications of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle on virtual particles.

Hymne
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
I often read that particle-pairs that are created in the vacuum consists of a particle and it´s antiparticle which both have an positive energy that is "borrowed" from spacetime according to Heisenbergs Uncertainty principle.
But when it comes to Hawking radiation one often refers to one of the particle as a negativ energy particle, which is very confusing :confused:.
What is true, does particle pairs consist of positive-energy particles or on positive and one negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved it.. The thread can be thrown away.
 
And? What is your answer?

BTW, I am just writing a paper that should resolve the puzzle of negative-energy particles in Hawking radiation. But don't ask me about that before I write it.
 

Similar threads

High School Can virtual particles turn into real particles? (news about new study)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Does virtual particle-antiparticle annihilation produce anything?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Graduate Destruction of virtual particles and virtual particle pairs
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
Undergrad Virtual Particles and Energy Scales
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Why KE of Annihilation Electrons Differs?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
High School Virtual particles and Heisenberg
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Undergrad Quantum fluctuations & 'virtual particles'
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Graduate Particles vs. Virtual Particles vs. Fields
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Do all exchange bosons violate energy conservation?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Why exactly do Virtual Particles not violate Conservation of energy?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K