MHB Visual illustration of Pearson correlation coefficient r

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficient using a sample dataset with five data points. A visual illustration was created to depict the relationship between the variables x and y, including color-coded mean lines for clarity. The covariance formula and the standard deviation calculations for both x and y were correctly applied in the context of the diagram. It was confirmed that the interpretation of the correlation coefficient and its formula were accurate. The formula for r can be simplified, emphasizing the relationship between the covariance and the standard deviations of the datasets.
dhiraj
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
From what I have understood about Pearson correlation coefficient I have created a visual illustration, I would like to know if this understanding looks correct.

Say I have a sample with 5 data points:-

x y
8 6
16 8
20 16
28 12
32 20

My goal is to calculate Pearson correlation coefficient between x and y.

So this is how the diagram I created looks like:-

View attachment 6472

I have done appropriate color coding.

So in this case the covariance between x and y is:-

[math]cov(x,y) = \frac {\sum d_x d_y}{n-1} [/math]

[math]d_x[/math] and [math]d_y[/math] are the deviations (not standard deviation) from [math]\bar{x}[/math] and [math]\bar{y}[/math] respectively, these mean lines are shown in the diagram (red line for [math]\bar{x}[/math] and the green line for [math]\bar{y}[/math]).

Pearson correlation coefficient [math] r = \frac{cov(x,y)}{S_x S_y} [/math]

Based on the diagram, standard deviations of x and y are:-

[math]S_x = \sqrt{ \frac{\sum d_x^2}{n-1} }[/math]

[math]S_y = \sqrt{ \frac{\sum d_y^2}{n-1} }[/math]

So replacing these in the formula for the correlation coefficient we get:-
[math] r = \frac {\sum d_x d_y} { (n-1) \sqrt{ \frac{\sum d_x^2}{n-1} } \sqrt{ \frac{\sum d_y^2}{n-1} } } [/math]Is this interpretation correct with respect to the diagram I have shown? I know the signs of [math]d_x[/math] and [math]d_y[/math] will depend on which side of [math]\bar{x}[/math] and [math]\bar{y}[/math] , [math]x[/math] and [math]y[/math] appear.
 

Attachments

  • Correlation.png
    Correlation.png
    5.4 KB · Views: 110
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi dhiraj!

It's all correct.
And note that the formula for $r$ can be simplified to:
$$ r = \frac {\sum d_x d_y} {\sqrt{ \sum d_x^2 } \sqrt{ \sum d_y^2 }}$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top