Voltage Confusion: What Am I Missing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaccobtw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Voltage
Click For Summary
Voltage is related to the electric potential energy between charged particles, where decreasing distance increases voltage due to the inverse relationship in the equation V = k*q/r. While increasing distance does require more work to separate charges, it also means that the potential energy increases as the distance increases. The confusion arises from the distinction between voltage, which is energy per unit charge, and the work done in moving charges in an electric field. Understanding these concepts clarifies how voltage behaves in relation to distance and charge interactions. The discussion highlights the importance of grasping electric potential and its implications in electrostatics.
Jaccobtw
Messages
163
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
For two oppositely charged particles, does the distance between them increase or decrease voltage?
Relevant Equations
V = kq/r
I'm confused about voltage. According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles, but doesn't increasing the distance increase the potetnial energy between the two particles because the amount of work done would increase with distance, correct? It takes more energy to separate a charge a greater amount of distance increasing the voltage. Also the particles would have greater kinetic energy beginning from a larger distance.. What am I not understanding here? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Jaccobtw said:
I'm confused about voltage.
Perhaps it helps to consider the electric potential field as energy per unit of charge.

Jaccobtw said:
According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles,
And not talk of voltage between particles.

So a single charge ##q_1##, located at the origin of a coordinate system, has an electric field potential associated in space according to ##V = {k\,q_1\over r}##.

To bring a test charge ##q_2## (a second charge) from infinity to a position at distance ##r## from the origin requires an energy of ##q_2V =
{k\,q_1q_2\over r}##.
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of opposite sign.

[edit] OOPS! Someone should have jumped on this !
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of the same sign.

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
871
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
995
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K