Voltage Confusion: What Am I Missing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaccobtw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Voltage
AI Thread Summary
Voltage is related to the electric potential energy between charged particles, where decreasing distance increases voltage due to the inverse relationship in the equation V = k*q/r. While increasing distance does require more work to separate charges, it also means that the potential energy increases as the distance increases. The confusion arises from the distinction between voltage, which is energy per unit charge, and the work done in moving charges in an electric field. Understanding these concepts clarifies how voltage behaves in relation to distance and charge interactions. The discussion highlights the importance of grasping electric potential and its implications in electrostatics.
Jaccobtw
Messages
163
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
For two oppositely charged particles, does the distance between them increase or decrease voltage?
Relevant Equations
V = kq/r
I'm confused about voltage. According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles, but doesn't increasing the distance increase the potetnial energy between the two particles because the amount of work done would increase with distance, correct? It takes more energy to separate a charge a greater amount of distance increasing the voltage. Also the particles would have greater kinetic energy beginning from a larger distance.. What am I not understanding here? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
Jaccobtw said:
I'm confused about voltage.
Perhaps it helps to consider the electric potential field as energy per unit of charge.

Jaccobtw said:
According to this equation, decreasing distance would increase the voltage between two oppositely charge particles,
And not talk of voltage between particles.

So a single charge ##q_1##, located at the origin of a coordinate system, has an electric field potential associated in space according to ##V = {k\,q_1\over r}##.

To bring a test charge ##q_2## (a second charge) from infinity to a position at distance ##r## from the origin requires an energy of ##q_2V =
{k\,q_1q_2\over r}##.
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of opposite sign.

[edit] OOPS! Someone should have jumped on this !
I.e. work has to be done to do this if the charges are of the same sign.

##\ ##
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top