Voltage Difference Along a Path

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the voltage difference along a piecewise linear path in an electric field defined by E = (2x−y²)ax + (3z−2xy)ay + 3yaz. The path connects points A(−2,1,−1), P(2,1,−1), Q(2,3,−1), and B(2,3,1), and requires evaluating the integral of the electric field along these segments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up the line equations for the path segments and express concerns about division by zero when calculating the integral. There is an exploration of how to simplify the expression for the integral based on the nature of the path.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on simplifying the integral expression, particularly in the context of the path from A to P. There is acknowledgment of the special nature of this path, and some participants express confidence in their simplifications.

Contextual Notes

Participants are preparing for an upcoming exam and are focused on ensuring their understanding of the problem setup and integral evaluation. There is a mention of a solution key that confirms one participant's result, which raises questions about the correctness of their approach.

Jake 7174
Messages
80
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



Given the electric field E = (2x−y2)ax + (3z−2xy)ay + 3yaz, and the piecewise linear path joining the points A(−2,1,−1), P(2,1,−1), Q(2,3,−1) and B(2,3,1), find −∫E⋅dl from A to P − ∫E⋅dl from P to Q − ∫E⋅dl from Q to B along the straight line segments.

Homework Equations



−∫E⋅dl

(x - x1) / (x1 - x2 ) = (y - y1) / (y1 - y2 ) =(z - z1) / (z1 - z2 )

The Attempt at a Solution



I have solved this problem going direct from point a to b by using the above equation and found that the answer is 8 v. This is confirmed by the answer key. Here is my problem, when I set up the line equation to go from point A to P I get the following;

(x + 2) / (-2 - 2) = (y - 1) / (1 - 1) = (z + 1) / (-1 + 1)

or, (x + 2) / -4 = (y - 1) / 0 = (z + 1) / 0

I am ultimatley going to solve for y and z in terms of x to express my integral in terms of just x and I know how to get rid of the pesky dy and dz as well but I need the line equation to not blow up on me.

How do I resolve the division by 0? I know that the VAQ = 4 v from the solution but I am not sure what to do about the line equation.

I have an exam on Monday and I am certain a question like this will appear.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jake 7174 said:
Here is my problem, when I set up the line equation to go from point A to Q
Did you mean to write A to P?
I get the following;

(x + 2) / (-2 - 2) = (y - 1) / (1 - 1) = (z + 1) / (-1 + 1)

or, (x + 2) / -4 = (y - 1) / 0 = (z + 1) / 0

I am ultimatley going to solve for y and z in terms of x to express my integral in terms of just x and I know how to get rid of the pesky dy and dz as well but I need the line equation to not blow up on me.

How do I resolve the division by 0?

The division by 0 comes from the special nature of the path from A to P. For that path, how would you simplify the expression

##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x+E_ydl_y+E_zdl_z##?
 
TSny said:
Did you mean to write A to P?The division by 0 comes from the special nature of the path from A to P. For that path, how would you simplify the expression

##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x+E_ydl_y+E_zdl_z##?
TSny said:
Did you mean to write A to P?The division by 0 comes from the special nature of the path from A to P. For that path, how would you simplify the expression

##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x+E_ydl_y+E_zdl_z##?
I did mean to write A to P. I fixed it.

if y = z then dly = dlz = 0

so the expression simplifies to ##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x##
 
Jake 7174 said:
I did mean to write A to P. I fixed it.

if y = z then dly = dlz = 0

so the expression simplifies to ##\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l} = E_xdl_x##

If this is the case then I have
-∫ (2x - y^2) dx from x= -2 to 2 but Y =1

so, -∫ (2x - 1^2) dx = 4

This is the result I am looking for. I want to be sure I didnt luck into it and that I simplified it correctly as you suggested.
 
Jake 7174 said:
If this is the case then I have
-∫ (2x - y^2) dx from x= -2 to 2 but Y =1

so, -∫ (2x - 1^2) dx = 4

This is the result I am looking for. I want to be sure I didnt luck into it and that I simplified it correctly as you suggested.
That looks very good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jake 7174
TSny said:
That looks very good.
Awesome, Thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
1K