How Do You Calculate Voltage Drop Across Multiple Resistors?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the voltage drop across multiple resistors in a circuit, specifically focusing on a homework problem involving resistors in parallel and series configurations. Participants explore various methods to determine the voltage at specific points in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests finding the equivalent resistance (Req), source current, and using the current divider rule to find the current in each branch, followed by calculating the voltage at the points.
  • Another participant proposes that it is possible to determine the voltage at node C without performing detailed calculations, hinting at the potential divider rule as a simpler approach.
  • There is a correction regarding the calculation of equivalent resistance, with one participant stating a different value than initially calculated.
  • Participants discuss the application of the voltage divider rule, with one confirming the correctness of their calculations for points A and B, while expressing uncertainty about the calculation for point D.
  • One participant agrees with another's calculation for point D but questions the rounding of values in the provided answers.
  • There are multiple calculations presented for the total current and voltage at various points, with some participants correcting each other's calculations and providing alternative methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to solve the problem, with some favoring the current divider rule while others advocate for the potential divider rule. There is no consensus on the correctness of certain voltage values, particularly for point D, and participants continue to refine their calculations without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on the interpretation of the circuit configuration, and there are unresolved discrepancies in the calculated values for certain points. The discussion reflects ongoing adjustments to assumptions and methods used in the calculations.

orangeincup
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the voltage at each labelled point with respect to ground

Homework Equations


V*r1/(r1+r2)
i*r1/(r1+r2)
i=v/R

The Attempt at a Solution

I'm doing a practice problem and I can't seem to get the right answer.

I just want direction in the way to solve it, these are my "ideas" so far is to
Find Req, find source current, use current divider rule and find current in each branch. Then calculate the voltage at the points(I assume its just current*resistance of the resistor in front of the point?) I have no idea if this is the way I'm meant to solve it but I tried it anyways.

So left side total resistance is 650,
Right side is 1100,
top is 1000
all are in parallel? Or is 1000 in series with two parallel? I assumed in parallel in my calculations.

650ohm||1100 ohm = 393.93 ohm
393.93 ohm||1000 ohm=282.6 Req
50V/282.6 Req=0.1769 is

0.1796 mA*1000/2393.93 ohm = 0.073907 mA for current through the entire circuit excluding top

0.073907 mA * 1100ohm/1750 ohm=0.0464 current through left side

voltage at B = 0.0464*100ohm=4.64 V

The answers are meant to be
A=3.85 V
B=42.31 V
C=50 V
D=5 V
 

Attachments

  • 1f4.png
    1f4.png
    18.7 KB · Views: 536
Physics news on Phys.org
I just want direction in the way to solve it, these are my "ideas" so far is to
Find Req, find source current, use current divider rule and find current in each branch.

I think that's the wrong approach (edit: although it would work).

The three branches (left, right, top) are indeed all in parallel (between node C and earth/0V) but there is an easier way to work out the current in each branch. Have another look at the circuit. It's possible to work out the voltage at C without doing any calculations.

Edit 2: Actually you don't need to work out any of the currents. Start by working out the voltage at node C. Then have you heard of the potential divider rule?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: orangeincup
If you want to do it your way...

650ohm||1100 ohm = 393.93 ohm

= 408.6 not 393.93
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: orangeincup
I tried calculating with the changed value of 408.6 A

408.6||1000=290

50/290ohm=0.172 is
0.172*1000/1048.6=0.164
0.164 * 1100/1750=0.10335
0.1033*50=5 V

I can't seem to make it work calculating currents, I looked into voltage divider rule..

so 50 V * 50/650 = 3.84 A(correct) for A
50 V* 550/650= 42.3 A(correct) for B
50 V* 100/1100 = 4.54 V(not correct) for D
and C is 50 V

The answer for D is meant to be 5, I'm not sure if I made an error or if they simply rounded the value up.
 
..I looked into voltage divider rule..

so 50 V * 50/650 = 3.84 A(correct) for A
50 V* 550/650= 42.3 A(correct) for B
50 V* 100/1100 = 4.54 V(not correct) for D
and C is 50 V

That's by far the fastest way to solve the problem.
I agree with your answer for D. I've no idea why they rounded that to 5V yet they didn't round the voltage for A to 4V.

I tried calculating with the changed value of 408.6 A

408.6||1000=290
50/290ohm=0.172 is
0.172*1000/1048.6=0.164
0.164 * 1100/1750=0.10335
0.1033*50=5 V

Which branch is that for? I have assumed the top one ...

0.172mA total current is correct. You made a mistake in the next line. It should be...

ITop = ITotal * (650||1100) / {650||1100 + 1000}
= ITotal * 408 / {408 + 1000}
= ITotal * 408 / 1408
= 0.172mA * 408 / 1408
= 50uA (edit: well ok it's actually 49.8uA)

As a check..
50V/1MOhm = 50uA

Sorry for all the edits I made to this post.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K